RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Factors influencing healthcare providers’ knowledge and skills retention following helping mothers survive and helping babies survive training in Tanzania: A mixed methods cross-sectional study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.19.24317563
DO 10.1101/2024.11.19.24317563
A1 Mwilike, Beatrice Erastus
A1 Rimoy, Martha
A1 Mabada, Lucy
A1 Komba, Nicodem
A1 Mwanga, Feddy
A1 Gosse, Rashid
A1 Ambikile, Joel
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/20/2024.11.19.24317563.abstract
AB The Tanzanian Midwives Association (TAMA), in collaboration with development partners, implemented a project (50,000 Happy Birthdays) from 2018 to 2020 to improve providers’ knowledge and skills in saving lives at birth. The project was implemented under two training modules namely Helping Mothers Survive (HMS) and Helping Babies Survive (HBS). Through a mixed-methods cross-sectional design, knowledge retention was assessed by comparing follow-up and post-test knowledge scores among healthcare providers in the selected health facilities in Tanga, Geita, and Katavi regions. Four knowledge areas were evaluated using a written test and five skills areas were assessed using skills observation checklists for each. Quantitative data was analyzed using IBM SPSS version 25 by performing descriptive analysis, t-test and One-Way ANOVA with the level of significance determined at p< 0.05. Qualitative analysis was conducted through a thematic analysis approach and themes were generated to describe the factors influencing retention. 210 respondents participated in the study with more than half holding diploma (n=116; 55.2%) and working in urban area (n=123; 58.6%). There was a statistically significant drop in mean knowledge scores for controlling bleeding after birth (t=15.404, p<0.001), in helping babies breathe (t=8.580, p<0.001), and in essential care for small babies (t=19.620, p<0.001). Working in a rural area had a statistical significant higher drop in mean knowledge scores for managing pre-eclampsia (F=4.491, p=0.035) and for helping babies breathe (F=5.005, p=0.026). Education level also showed a significant difference in the mean knowledge score for managing pre-eclampsia (F=4.850, p=0.003).There was poor knowledge retention following receiving training on HMS and HBS. The level of professional education and residential area significantly influenced knowledge retention. Frequent refresher training and other relevant training among healthcare workers may be helpful in knowledge retention regarding maternal and neonatal care, with much emphasis on providers working in rural areas and those with lower level of professional education.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a grant from the Laerdal Foundation with a letter referenced 2022-0075. The grant was awarded to Dr. Beatrice Mwilike through the Tanzania Midwives Association (TAMA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethical approval for this study was granted by the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Research and Ethics Committee with Ref. No.DA.282/298/01.C/.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableData is uploaded as supplementary information.