RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2024.11.18.24317519 DO 10.1101/2024.11.18.24317519 A1 Doyon, Anke A1 Bayazit, Aysun Karabay A1 Duzova, Ali A1 Thurn, Daniela A1 Canpolat, Nur A1 Kaplan Bulut, Ipek A1 Azukaitis, Karolis A1 Obrycki, Lukasz A1 Ranchin, Bruno A1 Shroff, Rukshana A1 Candan, Cengiz A1 Erdogan, Hakan A1 Paripovic, Dusan A1 Donmez, Osman A1 Lugani, Francesca A1 Arbeiter, Klaus A1 Yilmaz, Ebru A1 Zaloszyc, Ariane A1 Wühl, Elke A1 Melk, Anette A1 Querfeld, Uwe A1 Schaefer, Franz A1 4C Study Consortium YR 2024 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/19/2024.11.18.24317519.abstract AB Rationale To investigate blood pressure (BP) trajectories, and the impact of pharmacological intervention in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).Methods Analysis of antihypertensive treatment (AHT) and BP slopes in 320 patients of the 4C Study cohort with CKD prior to renal replacement therapy, based on a minimum of three individual observations and two years of follow-up.Results At enrollment, 70 patients (22%) had uncontrolled or untreated hypertension, 130 patients (41%) had controlled hypertension, and 120 patients (37%) had normotension without antihypertensive treatment. AHT medication was prescribed in 53% of patients at baseline and initiated or added in 91 patients (AHT-I, 28%) during follow-up.Overall BP standard deviation score (SDS) remained stable over time in the cohort (ß= -0.037±0.034, p=0.34 and -0.029± 0.348, p=0.093 per year for systolic and diastolic BP SDS). In the AHT-I group, systolic and diastolic BP SDS was higher at baseline and decreased significantly during follow-up (−0.22±0.07, p<.003 and -0.12±0.05 SDS per year, p=0.01). Only 8/70 (11%) patients of the previously untreated/uncontrolled group remained untreated at the last observation, while 31 (44%) were controlled during follow-up. Of the 120 normotensive patients at baseline, 60% remained normotensive while 40% progressed to uncontrolled/untreated (n=23, 19%) or controlled (n=24, 20%) hypertension.Conclusions The study provides comprehensive real-world evidence on long-term management of blood pressure in children with CKD from the 4C Study. Although blood pressure control improved significantly with the intensification of antihypertensive therapy, a notable proportion of previously normotensive patients developed de novo hypertension over the observation period.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT01046448 at ClinicalTrials.govFunding StatementSupport for the 4C Study was received from the ERA-EDTA Research Program, the KfH Foundation for Preventive Medicine and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01EO0802). The study was also supported by the European Reference Network for Rare Kidney Diseases (ERKNet), which is funded by the European Union within the framework of the EU4Health Program (101085068).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The 4C study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University (S-032/2009) and the institutional review boards at each participating institutionI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data and methods used in the analysis will be made accessible to any researcher for the purpose of reproducing the results or replicating the procedures, in accordance with the AHA Journals? Implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP Guidelines).