RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices of healthcare staff and students regarding disposal of unwanted medications: A systematic review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.17.24317468
DO 10.1101/2024.11.17.24317468
A1 Lam, Janeme
A1 El Nsouli, Dayana
A1 Lee, E Lyn
A1 Alqeisi, Tawfiq
A1 Kane, Ros
A1 McGonagle, Ian
A1 Laparidou, Despina
A1 Nelson, David
A1 Armani, Keivan
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/18/2024.11.17.24317468.1.abstract
AB Objectives We sought to review studies that examine healthcare professionals’ and students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding medication disposal. We also explore recommendations and barriers related to appropriate medication disposal.Design A systematic review was conducted that adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched up to 23rd February 2024.Study eligibility criteria and setting Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method primary research studies. There was no limitation on the publication date, geographical locations, or the study settings.Participants Pharmacists, doctors, nurses, and students from these respective professional groups in any country.Primary outcome measures The levels of healthcare staff and students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices about disposal of unwanted medications.Date extraction and synthesis Data extraction was conducted by four of the researchers independently. The study details were categorised into three main domains, i.e., knowledge, attitude, and practice using the KAP model. Other relevant information was also extracted, and synthesised in overall themes, such as challenges and recommendations.Results 37 studies from 18 countries (Asia n=21; USA n=7; Africa n=5; and EU n=2; South America n=2) were included. 86.5% (n=32) investigated participants’ knowledge of medication disposal. Although there was a good level of awareness about the environmental impacts, there were significant gaps in knowledge regarding correct disposal methods, available services, guidelines, and training. 30 studies explored participants’ attitudes toward medication disposal. There was a generally positive attitude towards the need for environmentally safe disposal practices. 35 studies evaluated participants’ practices in relation to medication disposal. Although there was generally a positive attitude and some understanding of appropriate disposal methods, the majority of the participants did not follow the practice guidelines, especially outside healthcare settings.Discussions and Conclusions While healthcare staff and students have fair knowledge and positive attitudes toward medicine disposal, their actual practices are lacking. One significant challenge identified is the limited awareness about proper disposal methods coupled with a lack of established services or guidelines. Even in cases where take-back programs are available, they often face issues with accessibility. To tackle these challenges, it is suggested that governmental bodies should establish and enforce clear policies on medication disposal while also expanding educational initiatives to increase understanding among professionals and students. Furthermore, improving access to take-back programs is crucial for ensuring safe medication disposal and minimising potential environmental and health hazards.PROSPERO registration number CRD42024503162.Strengths and limitations of this studyThe review used the theoretical framework (KAP model) to effectively structure the literature search and data organisation, ensuring a comprehensive focus on studies and consistent data collection and analysis.This review covered all three components of the KAP model that is knowledge, attitude and practice, resulting in a more robust data synthesis with increased generalisability.The review encompassed a considerable number of studies (n=37) conducted in 18 different countries across five continents. The diverse range of populations and settings enhances the broad relevance of the review’s results.The review only included studies in English language.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=503162 Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript