PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mebratie, Anagaw Derseh
AU  - Shamebo, Dessalegn
AU  - Alemu, Getnet
AU  - Shigute, Zemzem
AU  - Bedi, Arjun S.
TI  - Willingness of urban formal sector workers to support a community-based health insurance scheme in Ethiopia
AID  - 10.1101/2024.11.15.24317322
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.11.15.24317322
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/15/2024.11.15.24317322.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/15/2024.11.15.24317322.full
AB  - Introduction The Ethiopian health system is primarily financed through household out-of-pocket expenditure and financial support from donors. High user fees lead to catastrophic health spending and limited use of services. To promote healthcare-seeking behavior and provide financial protection through enhanced domestic financing, the Ethiopian government has designed two types of health insurance schemes. These are a Community-Based Health Insurance (CBHI) scheme for the informal sector and the yet to be implemented Social Health Insurance (SHI) scheme for the formal sector. In the short run, these schemes are expected to function independently. However, in the long run it is anticipated that they will be combined, thereby pooling risk. Combining the two schemes requires solidarity across the two groups targeted by each of the schemes. Since it is likely that formal sector employees may have to bear the cost of subsidizing the CBHI scheme, this study aims to assess the extent to which formal sector employees are willing to support the CBHI scheme.Methods The paper is based on a survey of 1,919 formal sector employees and pensioners residing in the major administrative regions of the country. A survey experiment was used to elicit support for the CBHI scheme. Respondents were randomly allocated to one of five cases. These cases differed in terms of the information provided regarding the source of the CBHI subsidy and the benefits associated with the CBHI. Support for CBHI was assessed using descriptive statistics, binary and ordered logit models.Results There is strong support from urban formal sector employees for the CBHI scheme. Regardless of the scenario presented, and despite some regional variation, the key result is that at least 66% of the surveyed participants, adjusting for non-response, supported the CBHI scheme. Good knowledge of insurance increased support while existing access to health insurance lowered it.Conclusion The study provides strong evidence of solidarity and the willingness of formal sector employees to support the CBHI scheme. While this bodes well for the sustained expansion of the CBHI, it is ironic, as formal sector employees are resisting the introduction of the SHI. This reluctance stems from concerns about the costs and skepticism of the benefits of the proposed SHI, whereas the positive outcomes associated with the CBHI are widely known.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by D.P. Hoijer Fonds, Erasmus Trustfonds, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Award/Grant number is not applicable.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Informed consent was obtained from respondents prior to data collection. Ethics approval (IDPR/LT-0005/2016) was provided by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Development Policy and Research, Addis Ababa University.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors