RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Matching Clinical Profiles with Interventions to Optimize Daily Stepping in People with Stroke
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.14.24317334
DO 10.1101/2024.11.14.24317334
A1 McCartney, Kiersten M.
A1 Pohlig, Ryan T.
A1 Miller, Allison
A1 Thompson, Elizabeth D.
A1 Reisman, Darcy
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/15/2024.11.14.24317334.abstract
AB Background Individualizing interventions is imperative to optimize physical activity in people with chronic stroke. This secondary analysis grouped individuals with chronic stroke into clinical profiles based on baseline characteristics and examined if these clinical profiles preferentially benefitted from a specific rehabilitation intervention to improve daily step-activity.Methods Participants had non-cerebellar strokes ≥6 months prior to enrollment, were 21-85 years old, had walking speeds of 0.3-1.0 m/s, and took <8,000 steps-per-day. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 interventions: high-intensity treadmill training (FAST), a step-activity behavioral intervention (SAM), or a combined intervention (FAST+SAM). The primary outcome was the interaction of latent class (clinical profile) and intervention group (FAST, SAM, FAST+SAM) on a change in steps-per-day. Key clinical characteristics to identify the latent classes included walking speed, walking endurance, balance self-efficacy, cognition, and area deprivation.Results Of the 190 participants with complete pre- and post-intervention data (mean [SD] age, 64 [12] years; 93 females [48.9%]), 3 distinct profiles of people with chronic stroke were identified. Within our sample, class 1 had the lowest walking capacity (speed and endurance), lowest balance self-efficacy, and highest area deprivation, and had the greatest change in step-activity when enrolled in the SAM (mean[95%CI], 1624 [426 – 2821]) or FAST+SAM (1150 [723 – 1577]) intervention. Class 2 had walking capacity, baseline steps-per-day, and self-efficacy values between Class 1 and 3, and had the greatest change in step-activity when enrolled in the SAM (2002 [1193–2811]) intervention. Class 3 had the highest walking capacity, highest self-efficacy, and lowest area deprivation and the greatest change in step-activity when enrolled in the FAST+SAM (1532 [915–2150]) intervention.Conclusions People with chronic stroke require different interventions to optimize a change in step-activity. Clinicians can use clinically relevant measures to personalize intervention selection to augment step-activity in people with chronic stroke.Trial Registration NCT02835313; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02835313Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044596 https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-018-1044-1 Funding StatementThis work was primarily funded by NIH/NICHD: Promoting Recovery Optimization with WALKing Exercise after Stroke (PROWALKS), 1R01HD086362; NIH/NICHD Predoctoral Training in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Research, T32HD007490; This research has been supported in full or part from the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research; NIH NICHD/NCMRR R25HD105583: Reproducible Rehabilitation Research Educational Program. The funding sources played no role in study design, execution, administration, or dissemination.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of the University of Delaware gave ethical approval for this work.[878153]I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Data from the primary analysis of the parent randomized control trial are available on the NICHD DASH repository. https://dash.nichd.nih.gov/study/425019 6MWTSix-Minute Walk TestABCActivities-specific Balance Confidence scaleADIArea Deprivation IndexAICAkaike’s Information criterionBICBayesian Information CriterionCCICharlson Co-morbidity IndexFASThigh-intensity treadmill trainingLMR-adjustedLo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio testLVMMLatent Variable Mixture ModelMoCAMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPHQ-9Patient Health Questionnaire-9POSTafter interventionPREbefore randomizationPROWALKSPromoting Recovery Optimization with Walking Exercise After StokeSAMstep-activity behavioral interventionSSWSself-selected walking speedVLMRVuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test