RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Associated Respiratory Failure
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.16.20155580
DO 10.1101/2020.07.16.20155580
A1 King, Christopher S.
A1 Sahjwani, Dhwani
A1 Brown, A. Whitney
A1 Feroz, Saad
A1 Cameron, Paula
A1 Osborn, Erik
A1 Desai, Mehul
A1 Djurkovic, Svetolik
A1 Kasarabada, Aditya
A1 Hinerman, Rachel
A1 Lantry, James
A1 Shlobin, Oksana A.
A1 Ahmad, Kareem
A1 Khangoora, Vikramjit
A1 Aryal, Shambhu
A1 Collins, A. Claire
A1 Speir, Alan
A1 Nathan, Steven
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/18/2020.07.16.20155580.abstract
AB Purpose The outcomes of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 remain poorly defined. We sought to determine clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 managed with invasive mechanical ventilation in an appropriately resourced US health care system.Methods Outcomes of COVID-19 infected patients requiring mechanical ventilation treated within the Inova Health System between March 5, 2020 and April 26, 2020 were evaluated through an electronic medical record review.Results 1023 COVID-19 positive patients were admitted to the Inova Health System during the study period. Of these, 165 (16.1%) were managed with invasive mechanical ventilation. At the time of data censoring, 63/165 patients (38.1%) had died and 102/165 (61.8%) were still alive. Of the surviving 102 patients, 17 (10.3%) remained on mechanical ventilation, 51 (30.9%) were extubated but remained hospitalized, and 34 (20.6%) had been discharged. Deceased patients were older (median age of 66 vs. 55, p <0.0001). 75.7% of patients over 70 years old had died at the time of data analysis. Conversely, % of patients age 70 or younger were still alive at the time of data analysis. Younger age, non-Caucasian race and treatment at a tertiary care center were all associated with survivor status.Conclusion Mortality of patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation is high, with particularly daunting mortality seen in patients of advanced age, even in a well-resourced health care system. A substantial proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation were not of advanced age, and this group had a reasonable chance for recovery.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Inova IRB approvedAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData for the study is available upon request