PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Passfield, Geoffrey
AU  - Mackay, Lisa
AU  - Crofts, Catherine
AU  - Schofield, Grant
TI  - A comparison of sleep metrics from mid-thigh and low-back accelerometers to wrist based data using open-source algorithms
AID  - 10.1101/2024.11.10.24317079
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.11.10.24317079
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/11/2024.11.10.24317079.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/11/2024.11.10.24317079.full
AB  - Introduction Wearable accelerometers are a valuable tool for monitoring sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity patterns within 24h time-use in free-living environments. While wrist-worn accelerometers are favoured for monitoring sleep, they do not accurately distinguish between sitting and lying positions (Narayanan et al., 2020). This study aims to determine whether back or thigh-mounted accelerometers yield sleep metrics comparable to wrist-worn devices using an open-source algorithm originally validated for the wrist.Methods Data from 20 healthy sleepers were collected using Axivity AX3 accelerometers. Participants wore accelerometers on their right thigh, low-back, and wrist for one night of sleep in their own bed. Sleep metrics were calculated using the van Hees algorithm through the GGIR package in R. The primary outcomes were: Total Sleep Time (TST), Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO), Awakenings (AWK), Sleep Efficiency (SE), Sleep Interval (SI) and Sleep Onset Timestamp (SOT). Within-subject ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and Cohen’s d were used to assess the comparability of sleep metrics between the body placements.Results Data analysis included all 20 participants. Mid-thigh accelerometers demonstrated a strong linear relationship with wrist accelerometers across all metrics (r = 0.86-0.98). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a narrow 95% confidence interval suggesting that wrist and mid-thigh metrics are in good agreement, except for AWK which is slightly underestimated by the mid-thigh device. Conversely, low-back accelerometers demonstrated moderate linear relationship with the wrist (r = 0.63-0.98) and the Bland-Altman results showed wide limits of agreement with significant overestimations of TST, SE, SI and underestimations of WASO, AWK, SOT. Cohen’s d demonstrated small differences between mid-thigh and wrist devices, except for AWK (d= 0.42). Low-back values for WASO, SE, and AWK showed moderate differences.Conclusions This analysis demonstrates that the mid-thigh accelerometer yields comparable sleep metrics to wrist-worn devices when processed with the van Hees algorithm.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from Auckland University of Technology ethics committee (AUTEC 22/300).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.