RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Network meta-analysis on the effects of various exercise modalities on pain control in populations with chronic nonspecific low back pain
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.07.24316901
DO 10.1101/2024.11.07.24316901
A1 Zhao, Ke
A1 Li, Hua
A1 Li, Li
A1 li, Yongxiao
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/10/2024.11.07.24316901.abstract
AB Objective This study aims to comprehensively evaluate and compare the effects of various exercise modalities on the control of chronic nonspecific low back pain through a network meta-analysis, in order to identify the most effective interventions.Methods Adhering strictly to the PRISMA guidelines, this study selected randomized controlled trials from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, up to June 30, 2024. Data were processed using Stata 17.0 software, and the effect sizes were synthesized using standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The SUCRA method was used to rank the effectiveness of the interventions.Results A total of 26 studies involving 1,507 participants aged between 20 and 63.5 years were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that yoga [SMD = −1.71 (−2.93, −0.49), P < 0.05] and core stability training [SMD = −0.81 (−1.44, −0.18), P < 0.05] were significantly more effective than the control group. SUCRA probability ranking indicated that Tai Chi (SUCRA = 77.4) might be the best modality for improving control of chronic nonspecific low back pain.Conclusion This network meta-analysis demonstrates the intervention effects of different exercise modalities on chronic nonspecific low back pain, with Tai Chi potentially being the most effective intervention. This provides an important reference for non-pharmacological interventions in chronic nonspecific low back pain.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:In this study, we did not involve human participants, human specimens or tissues, vertebrate animals or cephalopods, or vertebrate embryos or tissues. Therefore, this research did not require approval from an ethics review committee. We confirm that our research has complied with all applicable laws and regulations and has not violated any ethical standards.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are included in the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.