PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Hazewinkel, Audinga-Dea
AU  - Richmond, Rebecca C.
AU  - Wade, Kaitlin H.
AU  - Dixon, Padraig
TI  - Assessing the causal impact of adiposity variation on rates of hospital admission: Application of Mendelian randomization
AID  - 10.1101/2020.07.14.20153742
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.07.14.20153742
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/16/2020.07.14.20153742.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/16/2020.07.14.20153742.full
AB  - Background Body mass index (BMI) and waist-hip-ratio (WHR) are measures of adiposity, the former being a good marker for overall total body fat, the latter describing regional adiposity. Higher adiposity has been associated with the increased prevalence of many chronic diseases and a positive association between BMI and increased hospital admissions has previously been established. The aim of this study was to estimate the causal relationship between BMI, WHR and WHR adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI) and yearly hospital admission rates.Methods and Findings Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches were used to test the causal effect of BMI, WHR and WHRadjBMI on yearly hospital admission rates. Using data on 310,471 participants of White-British ancestry from the UK Biobank, we performed one-sample and two-sample MR analyses on the exposures individually and in a multivariable setting. MR analyses supported a causal role of adiposity on hospital admissions, with consistency across one- and two-sample MR methods. Primarily, one-sample MR analyses estimated fold-increases in yearly hospital admission rates of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.27), 1.26 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.58) and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.47) per SD for BMI, WHR and WHRadjBMI, respectively. A multivariable approach yielded estimates of 1.04 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.03) for BMI and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.67) for WHR, while adjusting for WHR and BMI, respectively.Conclusions The results support a causal role of higher BMI and WHR in increasing the yearly hospital admission rate. The attenuation of the BMI effect, when adjusting for WHR in the multivariable MR analyses, suggested that an adverse fat distribution, rather than a higher BMI itself, may drive the relationship between adiposity and increased risk of hospital admission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAH, RCR, KHW and PD are members of the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol which is supported by the Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol (MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/9). PD acknowledges support from a Medical Research Council Skills Development Fellowship (MR/P014259/1). RCR is a de Pass Vice Chancellor's Research Fellow at the University of Bristol. KHW was supported by the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol and the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (204813/Z/16/Z) and works within a group funded by the Wellcome Trust Investigator Award (202802/Z/16/Z). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study makes use of data from the UK Biobank. The UK Biobank received ethical approval from the North West-Haydock Research Ethics Committee (reference 11/NW/0382).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used is available from UK biobank. The outcome of interest, hospital admission count, was derived using electronic health records linked to the UK Biobank study. Code to define the admissions variable is available from https://github.com/pdixon-econ/admissions-biobank.