PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Magdon-Ismail, Zainab AU - Murphy, Sheree AU - Gauthier, Vickie AU - Wyrick, Tiana AU - Rowe, Cori AU - Austin, Rachael AU - Cuevas, Pennie AU - Pickreign, Jeremy AU - Coplin, Bruce TI - Using evidence-based strategies, including coverage of remote cardiac rehabilitation, to increase cardiac rehabilitation participation - a community health insurance plan’s experience AID - 10.1101/2024.11.07.24316943 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.11.07.24316943 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316943.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.07.24316943.full AB - Background Barriers to referral, enrollment, and participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) contribute to low rates of completion despite known benefits. Barriers are system, provider and patient related. In this observational cohort quality improvement study, we examined the impact a community-based, not-for-profit health insurance plan had on barriers to CR participation.Methods The Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan (CDPHP) in Albany, New York developed and implemented a cardiac rehabilitation initiative (CRI) to increase CR rates using evidence-based strategies. CDPHP: 1) eliminated patient cost-share, 2) covered remote CR (RCR), 3) implemented physician valued-based incentives, 4) presented metrics to providers, 5) educated providers and patients, and 6) dedicated staff to facilitating enrollment. Chi-square tests were used to identify differences among patients who enrolled in facility-based CR (FBCR), RCR and no CR. CR enrollment rate distributions were evaluated between Q1, 2021 and Q2, 2022.Results A total of 1,736 patients with varying cardiac conditions were eligible for CR in the study period. Between Q1, 2021 and Q2, 2022, enrollment went from 11.1% (32/286) to 16.2% (50/308) in FBCR; 0.7% (2/286) to 10.7% (33/308) in RCR; and 11.9% (34/286) to 26.9% (83/308) overall (P<.0001). Time to enrollment went from 40 to 47 days for FBCR (P=0.1792), 53 to 20 days for RCR (P<.0001) and 43 to 36 days overall (P=0.3348). Older patients were more likely to enroll in CR as were patients who underwent cardiac procedures.Conclusions The CRI created a call-to-action among providers to address CR referral and enrollment. RCR increased CR rates and were additive to FBCR rates, suggesting that the introduction of RCR will not displace FBCR. Time to enrollment improved overall, driven by improvement in those enrolling in RCR. Increasing CR engagement requires coordinated effort from stakeholders—cardiology providers, hospitals, CR providers and health plans.Competing Interest StatementZainab Magdon-Ismail was employed by the Capital District Physicians? Health Plan through the study period of this work; she is currently employed by Movn Health.Funding StatementThis program was supported in part by the New York State Department of Health/Health Research Inc. (HRI)?s CDC Innovative State and Local Public Health Strategies to Prevent and Manage Diabetes and Heart Disease and Stroke Program.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Sterling Institutional Review Board reviewed this initiative; patient informed consent was not required. Sterling IRB EXEMPT DETERMINATION, April 29, 2022. Enhanced Cardiac Rehab: Breaking Down the Barriers. Capital District Physicians? Health Plan. IRB ID: 10030-Zmagdonismail.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data used in this study belongs to The Capital District Physicians' Health Plan