PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Nattey, Cornelius AU - Maskew, Mhairi AU - Jinga, Nelly AU - Wise, Amy AU - van Dongen, Nicola AU - Brizido, Thalia Ferreira AU - Mudau, Maanda AU - Technau, Karl-G AU - Clouse, Kate TI - The impact of Option B+ policy on engagement in HIV care and viral suppression among pregnant women living with HIV in South Africa AID - 10.1101/2024.11.08.24316965 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.11.08.24316965 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.08.24316965.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/08/2024.11.08.24316965.full AB - Background Early access to HIV care impacts maternal outcomes and the risk of vertical transmission of HIV Option B+, a policy that mandates offering all pregnant women living with HIV (PWLH) lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) irrespective of their CD4 count, has been adopted across sub-Saharan Africa, including South Africa since 2015. This study aimed to assess the impact of Option B+ on engagement in HIV care and viral suppression among pregnant women in South Africa.Methods This observational study used data from pregnant women living with HIV who delivered at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa from 2013-2017. Linkage to a national HIV laboratory cohort (the NHLS National HIV cohort) was used to ascertain engagement in HIV care prior to antenatal care (ANC) entry and viral load outcomes. Analyses were stratified by the pre-Option B+ (2013-2015) and Option B+ (2016-2017) eras. We compared engagement rates before and during the Option B+ era and assessed factors associated with HIV care engagement and viral suppression. Risk ratios were estimated using log-binomial regression. Results: Among 4,865 PWLH, 65% had evidence of prior engagement in HIV care. Prior engagement in care was higher during the Option B+ era (66%) compared to the pre-Option B+ era (55%) (p<0.001). Younger women (18-24 years) were less likely to engage in HIV care than those aged 25-34 years (aRR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-0.9). Women with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm³ were less likely to have been engaged in care prior to pregnancy compared to those with CD4 ≥500 (aRR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.6-0.7). Primigravid women had a 30% lower likelihood of earlier HIV care engagement compared to those with 2-3 pregnancies (aRR 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.8). Overall viral suppression was higher in women reporting prior ART use compared to those with no prior HIV care (33% vs. 19%, p<0.001). During the four-year study period, the proportion of PWLH who had a viral load recorded but were not virally suppressed ranged from 22-36%.Conclusion The Option B+ policy led to increased engagement in HIV care prior to pregnancy. However, high prevalence of unsuppressed viral load during the Option B+ era highlights the need for continued monitoring and support to sustain the benefits of this policy. Pregnancy and antenatal care services remain an essential portal of entry to HIV care among PWLH in South Africa. Interventions to improve early ANC attendance and maternal engagement in HIV care prior to pregnancy are critical to eliminate vertical HIV transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Analyses of data from the Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital Maternal HIV Cohort and linkage of this cohort to laboratory data from the National Health Laboratory Services approved under protocol M200237 of the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand and the IRB of Boston University.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The maternal data underlying this article were provided with permission by the data gatekeeper for Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital and the Empilweni Services and Research Unit. Cohort participants provided written consent for data to be used for research purposes, and requests for access can be directed to Empilweni Services and Research Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa (email: karl-Gunter.Technau@wits.ac.za). Laboratory data linked to the maternal cohort are owned by the National Health Laboratory Services and access is governed by policies and procedures in response to requests made directly to the NHLS Office of Academic Affairs and Research. As such, the corresponding author does not have authority to release the data to the public or other data-sharing repositories. However, these data can be requested by the public through standardized request forms, which are then considered in an internal review procedure.