PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Tse, Tsui Yee Emily
AU  - Lam, Lo Kuen Cindy
AU  - Wong, King Ho Carlos
AU  - Yee, Chin Weng
AU  - Etz, Rebecca S.
AU  - Zyzanski, Stephen J.
AU  - Stange, Kurt C.
TI  - Cultural adaptation and content validity of a Chinese translation of the “Person-Centered Primary Care Measure”: findings from cognitive debriefing
AID  - 10.1101/2020.07.15.20154179
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.07.15.20154179
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/16/2020.07.15.20154179.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/16/2020.07.15.20154179.full
AB  - Objectives To develop an equivalent Chinese translation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) and to establish its cultural adaptability and content validity through cognitive debriefing.Design The original English PCPCM was first translated into Chinese by double forward-translation by professional translators. The reconciliated Chinese version was then doubly back-translated into English by two other professional translators blinded to the forward-translation. Upon affirmation on its linguistic equivalence with the developers of the original English PCPCM, the reconciliated Chinese PCPCM was sent for cognitive debriefing with twenty Chinese-speaking primary care subjects by a trained interviewer using structured probing questions to collect their opinions on the clarity, comprehensibility and relevance of each item and response option in the Measure.Setting Subjects were invited from a primary care clinic in Hong Kong to undergo the cognitive debriefing interviews. The interviews were divided into four groups chronologically to allow revision of the items to be made in between.Participants Ten males of age ranged from twenty-eight to sixty-eight and ten females of age ranged from thirty-seven to seventy completed the cognitive interviews. They were all Cantonese-speaking Chinese recruited by convenience sampling. Subjects with cognitive impairment, could not read Chinese, too old or too sick to complete the interviews were excluded from the study.Results An average of 3.3 minutes (range 3 to 4 minutes) was required for the subjects to self-complete the Measure. All items were generally perceived to be easily understood and relevant. Modifications were made to items with the content validity index on clarity or understanding <0.8 in each round of the interviews or if a majority of the subjects suggested rewording. Revisions were made to two items in the Chinese PCPCM throughout the whole cognitive debriefing process before the final version was confirmed. The average content validity index (CVI) on clarity of the Chinese PCPCM items ranged from 0.75 to 1. The average CVI on understanding ranged from 0.7 to 1. The average CVI on relevance ranged from 0.55 to 1.Conclusions The content validity of the PCPCM was good enough to allow further testing of its psychometric properties in a larger population.Question Is our Chinese translation of The Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) a culturally adaptable and valid measure?Finding Our Chinese version of the PCPCM was confirmed to be culturally adaptable. It showed high content validity indices regarding its clarity, understanding and relevance through cognitive debriefing.Meaning This Chinese version of the PCPCM is ready for further testing of its psychometric properties in a larger population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study is solely funded by the New staff Start-up Package granted by The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of MedicineAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/ Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (HKU/HA HKW IRB) IRB Reference Number: UW 18-492All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are available upon reasonable request.