RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Connecting in COVID 19: Neurology tele-follow-up experience
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.13.20153171
DO 10.1101/2020.07.13.20153171
A1 Vibha, Deepti
A1 Srivastava, MV Padma
A1 Prasad, Kameshwar
A1 Tripathi, Manjari
A1 Srivastava, Achal Kumar
A1 Bhatia, Rohit
A1 Singh, Mamta Bhushan
A1 Vishnu, VY
A1 Rajan, Roopa
A1 Singh, Rajesh Kumar
A1 Gupta, Anu
A1 Das, Animesh
A1 Elavarasi, A
A1 Divya, MR
A1 Ramanujam, Bhargavi
A1 Shariff, A
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/15/2020.07.13.20153171.abstract
AB Introduction The lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic led to temporary closure of routine hospital services. This prompted the initiation of teleconsult follow-up in our department. The study outlines the experience of tele-follow-up at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India, and the perspective of neurologists about this novel approach.Methods The tele-follow-up was started from 26th March 2020. Data of follow up appointments was provided by the medical record section. The faculty and senior residents conducted the tele-follow-up. Communication was made via voice calls. The data for initial ten days was analyzed to find the utility and experience of the new service.Results In the initial ten working days, data of 968 patients was provided for tele-follow-up. A successful communication was made in 50.3% patients (contact with patients: 27.7% and family members 22.6%). The phone numbers which were not contactable/invalid/not available constituted 36.8% of the data. A total of 35 faculty and residents conducted the tele-follow-up. The utility of tele-follow-up was perceived as good by 71.4% of neurologists. Majority of neurologists (71.4%) observed that >90% of patients were continuing medications. Patients outside the city constituted 50-75% of the list. The survey revealed that all neurologists felt the need to continue tele-follow-up for far off stable patients post lock down and resumption of regular outpatient services.Conclusion The survey established the feasibility and utility of teleconsult for follow up of patients with neurological diseases who were attending the regular outpatient services before the lock down.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical clearance was taken from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Institute Ethics committee (IEC-301/17.04.2020).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe anonymous data may be shared on request