RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Social network heterogeneity is essential for contact tracing
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.05.20123141
DO 10.1101/2020.06.05.20123141
A1 Nielsen, Bjarke Frost
A1 Sneppen, Kim
A1 Simonsen, Lone
A1 Mathiesen, Joachim
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/14/2020.06.05.20123141.abstract
AB Contact tracing is suggested as an effective strategy for controlling an epidemic without severely limiting personal mobility. Here, we explore how social structure affects contact tracing of COVID-19. Using smartphone proximity data, we simulate the spread of COVID-19 and find that heterogeneity in the social network and activity levels of individuals decreases the severity of an epidemic and improves the effectiveness of contact tracing. As a mitigation strategy, contact tracing depends strongly on social structure and can be remarkably effective, even if only frequent contacts are traced. In perspective, this highlights the necessity of incorporating social heterogeneity into models of mitigation strategies.Significance StatementSignificance Statement The COVID-19 epidemic has put severe limitations on individual mobility in the form of lockdowns and closed national borders. Mitigation strategies permitting individual mobility while limiting disease spreading are needed, and contact tracing is a potentially effective example of such a strategy. We use smartphone proximity data to monitor contacts between people, and find that contact tracing is highly dependent on social structure, being very effective on real contact networks. This shows that mitigation of COVID-19 may be possible with contact tracing, and that epidemiological models must incorporate social network structure.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementKS received funding from the EU Horizon 2020 research programme under ERC grant No. 740704, and LS from the Carlsberg Foundation in Denmark.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data are from the Copenhagen Networks study. The entire Copenhagen Networks Study has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (DDPA) Journal no 2012-41-0664. DDPA is the relevant legal entity in Denmark. The full data set contains personally identifiable geospatial traces, alongwith telecommunication patterns and physical proximity data. According to the Act on Processing of Personal Data, such data cannot be made available in the public domain. We confirm that the data is available upon request to all interested researchers under conditions stipulated.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDatasets can be made available in GDPR-compliant form upon reasonable request.