RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Frostbite Immersion Rewarming Methods: Sink & Faucet vs Bucket vs Immersion Circulator
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.04.24316457
DO 10.1101/2024.11.04.24316457
A1 Alberta Frostbite Care Collaborative
A1 Douma, Matthew J.
A1 Tiwana, Jaskirat D.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/05/2024.11.04.24316457.abstract
AB Frostbite can lead to cellular damage, vascular injury, and an altered functional status. Current rapid rewarming methods are unreliable at maintaining water temperature between the gold standard range of 37°C and 39°C. However, immersion circulators can precisely maintain this temperature range throughout rewarming, potentially leading to better patient outcomes following frostbite injury. In-vitro rewarming trials were conducted using frozen wild boar (Sus scrofa) legs to evaluate 3 rewarming methods: sink and faucet, bucket, and immersion circulator. Porcine leg temperature and water temperature were measured every minute over the 30 minute duration of each trial. The immersion circulator method proved to be the most efficient at reaching the target tissue temperature (9 minutes) while maintaining the least variability in water temperature (0% of time spent below 37°C). Our study concludes that the immersion circulator method is superior to other methods as it achieves faster and more consistent rewarming. This method has the potential to enhance frostbite treatment protocols, particularly in clinical and field settings where consistent rewarming is difficult to achieve.Competing Interest StatementConflict of interest: Matthew J Douma is founder and owner of Miteh Health Solutions, a health technology laboratory and social enterprise in Edmonton Alberta.Funding StatementThis study was self-funded by the investigators.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.