RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Recommended Interventions for Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Delivery in the United States
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.05.24316713
DO 10.1101/2024.11.05.24316713
A1 Sultan, Pervez
A1 Zakowski, M
A1 Joudi, Kareem
A1 Singh, DJ
A1 Gregory, Kimberly D.
A1 Lyell, D
A1 Carvalho, Brendan
A1 Study investigators
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/05/2024.11.05.24316713.abstract
AB Background Existing enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) professional society recommendations lack intersociety collaboration, multidisciplinary expert input and involvement of patient stakeholders. This initiative aimed to develop a multidisciplinary set of ERAC interventions endorsed by relevant US professional societies and patient representatives.Methods This American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) led initiative received IRB approval from Stanford University. In total 19 stakeholders were invited to participate in this Delphi study, including 13 representatives from 8 US professional societies (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA - 1 representative), Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP - 2), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG - 4), Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM - 1), Society of OBGYN Hospitalists (SOGH - 1), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society (ERAS Society - 1), Association of Women’s Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses ((AWHONN -2), American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology (AANA - 1), a physical therapist, a lactation expert and 4 patient representatives from diverse backgrounds. A three-round modified Delphi approach was conducted (2 rounds of electronic questionnaires and a 3rdround of e-discussion), to produce the final set of ERAC recommendations. An initial list of 70 interventions was compiled based on a previously published systematic review of ERAC studies and professional society guidelines/recommendations (ERAS Society, SOAP, and Healthcare Canada). Consensus was obtained for the final list of interventions, with strong consensus defined as ≥70% agreement and weak consensus as 50–69% agreement.Results All professional societies that were approached provided content-expert stakeholders to participate, and all stakeholders completed all rounds of the Delphi process. A final set of 32 interventions (6 preoperative, 13 intraoperative and 13 postoperative) achieved strong consensus.Conclusions This US intersociety and multidisciplinary Delphi study resulted in a list of ERAC interventions, which should be considered when implementing ERAC within US labor and delivery units.Competing Interest StatementPervez Sultan has received funding from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL166253-01A1 and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD113142-01). Kimberly Gregory has received funding from the UCLA CTSI 2UL1TR001881-06A1 and the Helping Hand of Los Angeles Mariam Jacobs Endowed Chair. Funding sources had no involvement in: (1) the study design; (2) the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; (3) the writing of the report; nor (4) in the decision to submit the article for publication. Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript