RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessment of the school environment for risk factors for tungiasis in nine counties of Kenya: a cross-sectional survey
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.02.24316660
DO 10.1101/2024.11.02.24316660
A1 Elson, Lynne
A1 Kamau, Christopher
A1 Koech, Sammy
A1 Muthama, Christopher
A1 Gachomba, George
A1 Sinoti, Erastus
A1 Chondo, Elwyn
A1 Mburu, Eliud
A1 Wakio, Miriam
A1 Lore, Jimmy
A1 Maia, Marta
A1 Adetifa, Ifedayo
A1 Orindi, Benedict
A1 Bejon, Phillip
A1 Fillinger, Ulrike
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/05/2024.11.02.24316660.abstract
AB Background Tungiasis is a neglected tropical skin disease mostly affecting children under 15 years, the elderly and disabled people in the most resource poor populations in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. While most transmission seems to occur at home inside houses, we aimed to identify factors in the school environment that may put children at increased risk of infection.Methods As part of a cross-sectional school-based prevalence survey of 21,466 pupils in nine counties of Kenya, observations of school infrastructure were made and the headteacher interviewed in each of 196 schools. In a subset of 97 schools, detailed observations of 322 classrooms were made and 117 teachers interviewed. Mixed effect logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with tungiasis infection in pupils.Results We found a higher odds of tungiasis infection for pupils in schools where more than 400 pupils were enrolled (aOR 2.24, 95% CI 1.12−4.50, p=0.023), where clean water was not always available (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.13−4.60, p=0.021); and if the school buildings were in a bad structural condition (aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.00−4.62, p=0.050). Of the 5,102 pupils in 97 schools, 99% studied in a classroom with a concrete floor and those with a lot of loose soil or sand on top of the concrete floor had a six times higher odds of infection than those on a clean concrete floor (aOR 6.52, 95% CI 1.61−26.35, p=0.008). Only 45% of (head)teachers in affected schools knew they had infected pupils in their school or grade. Those who did, were aware of the impact it was having on the pupils and yet only three of 76 affected schools had conducted a tungiasis intervention activity within the last year.Conclusion Most schools do not pose a risk of tungiasis for pupils, instead the home environment is the main risk. However, where school buildings are not well maintained and water not always available a multisectoral approach to control tungiasis is needed involving the Department of Health as well as the school management and the Department of Education.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch funding for this work was provided by the Wellcome Trust through the project Epidemiology of Tungiasis (grant number 213724/Z/18/) granted to Lynne Elson as a Career Re-Entry Fellowship. This work was written with the permission of Director KEMRI-CGMRC. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors. The funders had neither a role in the design of the study, nor in collection, analysis, interpretation of data nor in writing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Scientific and Ethics Review Committee of KEMRI (approval number KEMRI/SERU/CGMR-C/170/3895) and the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (reference number 38-19) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets and other materials supporting the conclusions of this article are available on KWTRP Research Data Repository at Harvard Dataverse.https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XM4K5I.