RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Age-specific social mixing of school-aged children in a US setting using proximity detecting sensors and contact surveys
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.12.20151696
DO 10.1101/2020.07.12.20151696
A1 Grantz, Kyra H.
A1 Cummings, Derek A.T.
A1 Zimmer, Shanta
A1 Vukotich, Charles
A1 Galloway, David
A1 Schweizer, Mary Lou
A1 Guclu, Hasan
A1 Cousins, Jennifer
A1 Lingle, Carrie
A1 Yearwood, Gabby M.H.
A1 Li, Kan
A1 Calderone, Patti
A1 Noble, Eva
A1 Gao, Hongjiang
A1 Rainey, Jeanette
A1 Uzicanin, Amra
A1 Read, Jonathan M.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/14/2020.07.12.20151696.abstract
AB Comparisons of the utility and accuracy of methods for measuring social interactions relevant to disease transmission are rare. To increase the evidence base supporting specific methods to measure social interaction, we compared data from self-reported contact surveys and wearable proximity sensors from a cohort of schoolchildren in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Although the number and type of contacts recorded by each participant differed between the two methods, we found good correspondence between the two methods in aggregate measures of age-specific interactions. Fewer, but longer, contacts were reported in surveys, relative to the generally short proximal interactions captured by wearable sensors. When adjusted for expectations of proportionate mixing, though, the two methods produced highly similar, assortative age-mixing matrices. These aggregate mixing matrices, when used in simulation, resulted in similar estimates of risk of infection by age. While proximity sensors and survey methods may not be interchangeable for capturing individual contacts, they can generate highly correlated data on age-specific mixing patterns relevant to the dynamics of respiratory virus transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Cooperative Agreement 1U01CK00179-01). DATC and KHG received additional support from the US NIH MIDAS program U54 GM088491. JMR acknowledges support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N014499/1)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the ethics committees at the University of Pittsburgh (PRO1102050), the University of Florida (IRB201701941), the University of Liverpool, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (IRB00000319)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified dataset is available through the Zenodo Repository doi:10.5281/zenodo.3940772 https://zenodo.org/record/3940772