RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Long COVID: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a South Texas Long COVID Clinic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.11.03.24316669
DO 10.1101/2024.11.03.24316669
A1 Wells, Anne Marie
A1 Rolin, Summer
A1 Robles-Ramamurthy, Barbara
A1 Gibson-Lopez, Gabriela
A1 Goros, Martin
A1 Gelfond, Jonathan A
A1 Gelfond, Stephen
A1 Balfanz, Philip
A1 Deuter, Melissa
A1 McGeary, Donald
A1 Verduzco-Gutierrez, Monica
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/04/2024.11.03.24316669.abstract
AB Long COVID, previously known as Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), refers to prolonged symptoms or diagnosable conditions following COVID-19 infection. The neuropsychiatric profile of Long COVID patients remains ambiguous. This study aimed to assess neuropsychiatric symptoms in a retrospective cohort of Long COVID patients (N = 162) at a Rehabilitation Medicine clinic in South Texas. Clinical data from patient records were used to calculate a Symptom Score, and screening tools for stress/PTSD (PCL-5), anxiety (GAD-7), and quality of life (SWL) were employed to evaluate if Long COVID duration and severity could predict neuropsychiatric outcomes. The majority were female (71%) and Hispanic (53%) who presented for treatment of Long COVID symptoms during the study period, including fatigue (93%), coughing/shortness of breath (81%), fever (67%), anosmia (58%), ageusia (54%), and weight loss (56%). There was a high burden of neuropsychiatric symptoms, including subjective cognitive impairment (79%), headache (74%), and insomnia (58%). Symptom Score (median = 9, IQR [8,11]) was significantly correlated with increased depression (PHQ-9; p < 0.05), anxiety (GAD-7; p < 0.05) and elevated stress/PTSD (PCL-5; p < 0.05) symptoms. Long COVID patients taking stimulants or mood stabilizers had higher GAD-7 (p < 0.031, p < 0.035) and PHQ-9 (p < 0.034, p < 0.009) scores but not PCL-5 scores. Importantly, duration of Long COVID symptomatology also did not predict PCL-5 scores. No patient factors (e.g., sex, age, BMI, ethnicity) mediated Symptom Score. Nonetheless, historically marginalized groups, such as women and Hispanics, have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. This study is the first to utilize validates screening tools to determine the presence and severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Long COVID patients. These findings may guide clinical management and future research on Long COVID, especially in historically excluded populations.Scope Statement We enthusiastically submit our Original Research article, entitled “Assessing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Long COVID: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a South Texas Long COVID Clinic” for consideration for publication in the journal Frontiers in Neurology. We believe the scope of our article aligns well with the scope and aim of the journal’s Neurorehabilitation Section.Long COVID is a debilitating neurological disorder with prominent and enduring cognitive and psychological impact. This study sought to characterize Long COVID symptoms from a cohort of patients at a Rehabilitation Medicine/Long COVID clinic in Southwest Texas. We stratified symptoms using validated psychiatric evaluation tools (e.g., PCL-5, GAD-7, PHQ-9) to determine if and to what extent psychiatric comorbidity exacerbated Long COVID symptoms. Our findings suggest that a Long COVID patient’s depression, anxiety, and stress/post traumatic stress scores are highly correlated with other neurological symptoms. We advance the implementation of a Long COVID “Symptom Score”, as well as the use of validated screening instruments to identify psychiatric features of Long COVID with the goal of maximizing life satisfaction and function over the course of treatment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grants UM1 TR004538 (JAG, MG). Training for AMW was supported by F30MH134482, T32R004545, STX-MSTP (T32GM113896 / T32GM145432), T32NS082145, R25NS089462. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was conducted under the approval of the Office of the Institutional Review Board at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Long School of Medicine (protocol #20210194EX).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.