RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Community Health Worker Outreach to Assess Confounders of Health
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.10.31.24316456
DO 10.1101/2024.10.31.24316456
A1 Takallou, Armin
A1 Mitchell, Emily
A1 Richardson, Gina M.
A1 Frank, Brian
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/02/2024.10.31.24316456.abstract
AB Background and Objectives In July 2020, recognizing the potential conflict between COVID-19 quarantine guidelines and other medical and social needs, a university-affiliated family medicine clinic developed a workflow to support patients who test positive for COVID-19. The workflow relies on Community Health Workers (CHWs) to call patients, identify needs, and connect them to community resources, with the goal of reducing barriers to maintaining COVID-19 isolation. The objective of this study was to understand the design, implementation, and maintenance of the workflow to provide guidance for other primary care practices interested in developing similar workflows.Methods This qualitative study was conducted in a federally qualified health center. Key informant interviews were conducted with six personnel involved in the workflow. Using a semi-structured interview guide, interviewers asked participants about the design, implementation, maintenance of the workflow, and benefits and harms. Interviews were analyzed using an immersion-crystallization approach.Results Across all workflow phases, adaptability and content expertise were reported as essential for workflow success. The main barrier was the lack of coordinated COVID-19-related workflows across the system. Delivery of whole-person care was identified as the primary benefit to both patients and the healthcare system.Conclusions Interview participants felt that integrating CHWs into the workflow benefitted patients and the clinic. For other practices interested in implementing a similar workflow, themes for success include a workflow framework built on patient-centeredness, adaptability, and the unique content expertise of CHWs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Portland Interhospital Physicians Association [grant number 1019264].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of the Oregon Health and Science University gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.