PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael
AU  - do Carmo Borges, Rafaela
AU  - Demarco, Giulia
AU  - Dotto, Lara
AU  - Schwendicke, Falk
AU  - Demarco, Flávio Fernando
TI  - Decontamination of N95 masks against coronavirus: a scoping review
AID  - 10.1101/2020.07.11.20151399
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.07.11.20151399
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/14/2020.07.11.20151399.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/14/2020.07.11.20151399.full
AB  - Background At present, it remains uncertain which method to decontaminate N95 is most suitable and should be recommended to healthcare professionals worldwide.Objectives The aim of this scoping review was to map and compile the available evidence about the effectiveness of decontaminating N95 masks against coronavirus.Methods We selected studies written in English assessing or discussing decontamination strategies of N95 masks against coronavirus. The search and study screening were performed in PubMed and SCOPUS by two independent researchers. A descriptive analysis was performed considering the study design of included studies.Results We included nineteen studies. Eight articles were letter to the editors, five were in vitro studies, three were literature reviews, and three were classified as other study designs. The use of vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet irradiation were the strategies most cited. However, there is a lack of evidence and consensus related to the best method of N95 masks decontamination.Conclusion The evidence towards decontamination strategies of N95 masks against coronavirus remains scarce. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet irradiation seem the current standard for N95 masks decontamination.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors thank the funding from FAPERGS PRONEX (16.0471-4) and CAPES Print UFPel. This study was conducted in a Graduate Program supported by CAPES, Brazil (Finance Code 001).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research does not require ethical approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.