RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.10.30.24316448
DO 10.1101/2024.10.30.24316448
A1 Pallath Majeed, Ansif
A1 Panakaje, Niyaz
A1 Thekke Veettil, Shajitha
A1 Harikumar, Kiran
A1 Al Mujalli, Hanan
A1 Ali Shah, Abdul
A1 Jassim AlKubaisi, Noora
A1 Sameer Alnuaimi, Ahmed
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/01/2024.10.30.24316448.abstract
AB Background Conducting clinical reviews is integral to the continuous process of enhancing healthcare quality by identifying specific areas or aspects within medical services and clinical practices. These reviews involve measuring a clinical outcome or process against established evidence-based standards, aiming to spotlight discrepancies between current practice and these benchmarks to facilitate improvements in care quality. Notably, clinical reviews rely on the exceptional skill of the driving force, underscored by key elements: the clinical expertise of participants, result confidentiality, and an objective strongly linked to the professional ‘quality’.The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is on the rise, especially in economically developing nations. Current research conducted in Qatar indicates a significant prevalence of diabetes mellitus within the adult population, alongside a considerable proportion of pre-diabetes cases that are likely to elevate the incidence of diabetes mellitus in the coming years. This information underscores the critical need for effective diabetes management at the primary care level, particularly for individuals with pre-diabetes. A comprehensive systematic assessment and intervention are essential to enhance diabetes care.Methods The proposed research will adopt a quasi-experimental design, which includes a baseline cross-sectional situational analysis conducted across 31 Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) prior to the intervention. The study will focus on patients aged 18 and older who have been diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), encompassing both newly diagnosed individuals and those in follow-up care, while excluding pregnant patients. A random sampling method will be utilized to ensure a representative sample size of 450 patients from the last three months of diabetes consultations. Following the identification of gaps in the situational analysis, an intervention will be implemented, after which a post-intervention cross-sectional study will be carried out using the same sample as the baseline to evaluate changes in the measured parameters. Additionally, a cohort study will be performed through a telephonic survey of a random sample of 60 patients, both before and after the intervention, to assess changes from the patients’ perspective.Discussion A comprehensive assessment and intervention are essential to evaluate the quality of diabetes care delivered at primary health centers. The ICAE-DM CARE study aims to provide an effective situational analysis, which will include the identification of gaps and the underlying causes of these gaps in the DM care using suitable quality improvement tools. The study will also showcase appropriate intervention strategies to improve practice. Furthermore, the implications of this process will be thoroughly examined. This study design will closely reflect a practical understanding of healthcare quality management in diabetes care, which can be applied in similar settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of PHCC (BUHOOTH-D-24-00059) has reviewed and granted approval for the study. Verbal consent will be obtained from participants who are 18 years of age or older for the telephonic survey. The overall planning and execution of the study will be conducted with integrity, in accordance with established ethical principles.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.