PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Mdege, Noreen Dadirai AU - Tchoupe, Christelle AU - Pokothoane, Retselisitsoe AU - Mirindi, Didier AU - Miderho, Christus Cito AU - Sams, Kelley AU - Shamba, Patrick AU - Kandate, Emmanuel AU - Milambo, Patrice AU - Ross, Hana TI - The illicit cigarette market in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC): findings from a cross-sectional study of empty cigarette packs AID - 10.1101/2024.10.25.24316163 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.10.25.24316163 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/29/2024.10.25.24316163.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/29/2024.10.25.24316163.full AB - This study aimed to estimate the proportion of cigarettes consumed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) that are illicit and the extent of cigarette tax evasion; and to identify the origins of and factors associated with illicit cigarettes. Data were collected from May 15 to June 9, 2023. Stratified, multistage sampling was used to select 32 health areas from which empty cigarette packs were collected. Each collected pack was examined and classified as licit if it complied, or illicit if it did not comply, with the DRC’s tax stamp or written health warning requirements, or the requirements to have a notice indicating the prohibition of sale by/to minors or information on tar and nicotine content. We reported frequencies as numbers and percentages, and means for continuous variables. We performed regression analysis and used adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) to measure associations. 8.6% of the 10622 empty cigarette packs collected were illicit. All of the illicit packs were also identified as having evaded cigarette tax. Approximately 8.0% of the collected packs did not comply with written health warning requirements, 5.6% did not indicate the prohibition of sale by/to minors, and 4.5% did not have information on tar and nicotine content. Packs from low-income areas were more likely to be illicit than those collected from high-income areas (aOR 1.90; [95% CI: 1.48-2.43]). The likelihood of being an illicit cigarette increased with increasing susceptibility to armed conflict/insecurity. Packs from border provinces were less likely to be illicit than those from non-border provinces (aOR 0.48; [95% CI: 0.25-0.90]). Our results show that the illicit cigarette trade market in the DRC is currently small, and most illicit cigarettes are imported from other countries. There is a need to secure the cigarette supply chain, including strengthening border controls.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-009670). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was obtained from the National Health Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health of the DRC on May 3, 2023 (approval number 443/CNES/BN/PMMF/2023).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Zenodo repository, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12359650.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12359650.