PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Finlay, Amy AU - Huang, Yuru AU - Adams, Jean AU - Jones, Andrew AU - Evans, Rebecca AU - Robinsona, Eric TI - Associations between out of home food sector outlet menu healthiness scores, menu characteristics and energy consumed by customers in 2021-2022 AID - 10.1101/2024.10.24.24316054 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.10.24.24316054 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/24/2024.10.24.24316054.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/24/2024.10.24.24316054.full AB - Greater consumption of food prepared outside of the home (OOH) is associated with higher energy intake. Strategies are needed to make eating OOH food less harmful to health. Identifying menu characteristics that contribute to higher energy consumption OOH could aid characterisation of OOH outlets by their relative healthiness and inform future policy intervention in the OOH food sector.Customers (N=3718) were asked to recall their food orders upon exiting a range of OOH outlets across four local authorities in England during 2021 and 2022. For each outlet, universal health rating scores were calculated based on select menu characteristics and deep learning healthiness scores were calculated based on outlet name. Random forest models and robust linear regression models clustered by outlet were used to identify whether outlet healthiness scores and individual menu characteristics were associated with kcal consumed.Universal health rating scores, but not deep learning scores, were predictive of energy consumed during OOH outlet visits (-28.27; 95% CI -44.76 to -11.77; p=.003). Menu characteristics with the greatest importance for predicting energy consumed were the percent of savoury main menu items over 600kcal and 1345kcal, the number of desserts, the number of unique vegetables, and the percent of drinks over 100kcal. Menu characteristics accounted for 29% of variance in energy consumed by customers.Universal health rating scores may be a useful tool to characterise the healthiness of OOH outlets in England. Investigating the potential impact of OOH outlet health ratings on consumer and business behaviour is now warranted.Competing Interest StatementER has previously received research funding from Unilever and the American Beverage Association for unrelated research projects. Other authors have no competing interests.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/vx9rb/ Funding StatementAmy Finlay is supported by an ESRC grant (ES/W007932/1). Jean Adams is supported by the Medical Research Council [grant number MC_UU_00006/7]. Yuru Huang is supported by NIHR funding (NIHR130597) and Eric Robinson is funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant reference: PIDS, 803194) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was granted by the University of Liverpool's Ethics Committee (Project ID: 10137) and all participants provided informed verbal consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData will be made available on the Open Science Framework upon publication