RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions, knowledge, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.07.20147413
DO 10.1101/2020.07.07.20147413
A1 Leigh, Jeanna Parsons
A1 Fiest, Kirsten
A1 Brundin-Mather, Rebecca
A1 Plotnikoff, Kara
A1 Soo, Andrea
A1 Sypes, Emma E.
A1 Whalen-Browne, Liam
A1 Ahmed, Sofia B.
A1 Burns, Karen E.A.
A1 Fox-Robichaud, Alison
A1 Kupsch, Shelly
A1 Longmore, Shelly
A1 Murthy, Srinivas
A1 Niven, Daniel J.
A1 Rochwerg, Bram
A1 Stelfox, Henry T.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/08/2020.07.07.20147413.abstract
AB Introduction Efforts to mitigate the global spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have largely relied on broad compliance with public health recommendations yet navigating the high volume of evolving information and misinformation related to SARS-CoV-2 can be challenging. We assessed national public perceptions (e.g., severity, concerns, health), knowledge (e.g., transmission, information sources), and behaviors (e.g., physical distancing) related to COVID-19 in Canada to understand public perspectives and inform future public health initiatives.Methods We administered a national online survey with the goal of obtaining responses from 2000 adults residing in Canada. Respondent sampling was stratified by age, sex, and region. We used descriptive statistics to summarize respondent characteristics and tested for significant overall regional differences using chi-squared tests and t-tests, as appropriate.Results We collected 1,996 eligible questionnaires between April 26th and May 1st, 2020. One-fifth (20%) of respondents knew someone diagnosed with COVID-19, but few had tested positive themselves (0.6%). Negative impacts of pandemic conditions were evidenced in several areas, including concerns about healthcare (e.g. sufficient equipment, 52%), pandemic stress (45%), and worsening social (49%) and mental/emotional (39%) health. Most respondents (88%) felt they had good to excellent knowledge of virus transmission, and predominantly accessed (74%) and trusted (60%) Canadian news television, newspapers/magazines, or non-government news websites for COVID-19 information. We found high compliance with distancing measures (80% either self-isolating or always physical distancing). We identified regional differences in perceptions, knowledge, and behaviors related to COVID-19.Discussion We found that knowledge about COVID-19 is largely acquired through domestic news sources, which may explain high self-reported compliance with prevention measures. The results highlight the broader impact of a pandemic on the general public’s overall health and wellbeing, outside of personal infection. The study findings should be used to inform public health communications during COVID-19 and future pandemics.Competing Interest StatementJPL is the primary investigator, KF, AS, SBA, KEAB, AFR, SK, SL, SM, DJN, BR, and HTS are co-investigators on a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the submitted work; AFR has received research grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization and is President of the Canadian Sepsis Foundation; HTS is supported by an Embedded Clinician Researcher Award from the CIHR; all authors declare no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canadian 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-2019) Rapid Research Funding Opportunity – Operating Grant (grant number RN420046-439965) to JPL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Dalhousie University (#2020-5121) and the University of Calgary (#20-0538) Research Ethics Boards approved this study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.