RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Screening for adverse childhood experiences in pediatric clinical settings: a scoping review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.10.21.24315896
DO 10.1101/2024.10.21.24315896
A1 Correa-Méndez, María José
A1 Vásquez, Mariana
A1 Restrepo, Laura
A1 Diaz, Valeria
A1 Escobar, Cristina
A1 Franky, Isabella
A1 Arango, Isabela
A1 Gómez, Oscar
A1 Gonzáles Ballesteros, Lina Maria
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/22/2024.10.21.24315896.abstract
AB Objective To compile the available literature regarding the usefulness, methodology used, and limitations of ACEs screening in a pediatric clinical sample, to prevent adverse health outcomes.Introduction Several studies have found an association between the presence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and the development of negative health outcomes, however the usefulness of screening for this condition and how to do so appropriately has not been established.Methods We included observational, descriptive, analytical, and experimental studies, qualitative studies, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and health policies that include the pediatric population from 3 to 17 years of age in a clinical setting. Studies in languages other than Spanish and English, protocols, and validation studies were excluded.The search strategy was designed using the PRISMA-S protocol to locate published and unpublished studies using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, LiLACS, PsycArticles and CINAHL databases and grey literature in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Studies in Spanish and English published since 2012 were included. The Rayyan platform was implemented to remove duplicates and for independent article selection by each author, with conflicts resolved through discussion. Data was extracted into an Excel database, highlighting information related to the objectives of the scoping review. After analyzing the data, we present them in different tables that summarize the findings of the review, with a narrative description.Results Our search yielded 8143 studies, from which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies varied in design, with most conducted in the United States, they were published between 2012 and 2024. The review identified several ACE screening tools (15), with an average response time of 15 minutes. Although some tools showed promise in identifying children at risk for adverse outcomes, significant gaps remain in the consistency and effectiveness of screening methods. Barriers such as lack of training for healthcare personnel, a lack of approach to patients with positive results, limited resources for follow-up care, and cultural differences in interpreting ACEs were often highlighted. There was no evidence of adequate standardization of screening methods, how to use them, and how to properly identify and categorize the presence of an ACE in childhood.Conclusions This scoping review highlights the potential of screening for ACEs in pediatric settings to prevent long-term health issues. However, the lack of standardized tools, protocols, and evidence of long-term benefits hinders its implementation. Although the association between ACEs and negative health outcomes is well-established, there is insufficient evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of screening. Cultural factors, especially in countries like Colombia, further complicate the adaptation of screening tools. The review suggests that a multidisciplinary, family-centered approach and training in trauma-informed care are essential. More research is needed to standardize ACE screening and evaluate its effectiveness in reducing health issues related to ACEs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/fs5pe/ Funding StatementThis paper does not have external funding, it was carried out using the researchers own resources with the exception of access to databases, which is covered by the subscriptions of the investigators institution.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors