PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Williams, Jessica
AU  - Bowles, Charlotte
AU  - Needham-Taylor, Antonia
AU  - Jarrom, David
AU  - Gillen, Elizabeth
AU  - Hounsome, Juliet
AU  - Davies, Jacob
AU  - Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
AU  - Edwards, Adrian
AU  - Cooper, Alison
AU  - Lewis, Ruth
TI  - Factors associated with childhood obesity or overweight in children under five years old: a rapid review
AID  - 10.1101/2024.10.14.24314839
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.10.14.24314839
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/15/2024.10.14.24314839.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/15/2024.10.14.24314839.full
AB  - Over one-quarter of children in Wales aged four-to-five are overweight or obese. Children who are overweight or obese may experience health issues during childhood or adolescence, or both. They are also more likely to be overweight or obese through to adulthood. A wide range of biological (e.g. genetics), psychological, environmental (e.g. barriers to physical activity and access to healthier foods) and societal (e.g. lifestyle and peer influence) factors can potentially be associated with childhood obesity or overweight.Evidence reviews of factors associated with childhood obesity or overweight already exist, but these examine the influence of the above factors across a range of ages. No up-to-date review focuses specifically on factors associated with obesity or overweight when both the factor and its impact on weight status were studied in children under five years of age. We aimed to review existing reviews to identify the factors associated with obesity and overweight, specifically when impact on weight status was reported in children under five years of age.The review included evidence available up until December 2023, and 30 systematic reviews were identified. A wide range of biological, psychological, environmental and societal factors were consistently found to be associated with an increased risk of childhood obesity and/or overweight. Factors consistently found to be associated with a decreased risk of childhood obesity and/or overweight were breastfeeding and larger household size. Most of the high-certainty evidence related to childhood overweight. No high-certainty evidence was identified on the association between factors and childhood obesity specifically, and further research studies are needed.The high-certainty evidence supports helping overweight women (who are thinking about having a baby or trying to conceive) to lose weight, reducing rapid weight gain during the first 12 months of life, providing opportunities for children of working mothers to access healthier foods and be more physically active. The moderate-certainty evidence supports promoting breastfeeding, reducing rapid weight gain during the first 13 months of life, monitoring the childs growth rate during the first two years of life (particularly for babies with catch-up growth), promoting baby-led weaning, reducing consumption of sugary drinks, and educating and supporting the wider caregivers to provide healthier foods and opportunities for play and physical activity.The findings from this review may differ from other reviews conducted to inform practice. This review only reports on obesity or overweight outcomes where they are measured before the age of five years, whereas previous reviews have measured these outcomes over a wider age range. This review also focusses on evidence that specifically classifies children as overweight or obese using body mass index (or other well-accepted measures for children under two years).Funding statement The authors and their Institutions were funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh GovernmentWhat is a Rapid Review?Our rapid reviews use a variation of the systematic-review approach, abbreviating or omitting some components to generate the evidence to inform stakeholders promptly whilst maintaining attention to bias. This work is an independent rapid review of systematic reviews.Who is this Rapid Review for?This work was requested by the Welsh Government Public Health and Inequalities team, as part of the Wellbeing and Future Generations Act work, to help inform the ‘Healthy Weight: Healthy Wales’ strategy and delivery plans. This rapid review may be helpful for policy makers and others involved in children’s health in Wales.Background / Aim of Rapid ReviewOver one-quarter of children aged four to five years old in Wales are either overweight or obese. Children who are overweight or obese may experience health issues during childhood and/or adolescence. They are also more likely to be overweight or obese through to adulthood, which can cause associated health problems. A wide range of biological (e.g. genetics), psychological, environmental (e.g. barriers to physical activity and access to healthier foods) and societal (e.g. lifestyle and peer influence) factors can potentially be associated with childhood obesity or overweight.Multiple evidence reviews of factors associated with childhood obesity or overweight already exist, but these examine the influence of the factors listed above across a range of ages. No up-to-date review focuses specifically on factors associated with obesity or overweight when both the factor and its impact on weight status were studied in children under five years of age.We aimed to review existing reviews to identify the factors associated with obesity and overweight, specifically when impact on weight status was reported in children under five years of age. This will help to inform the start of an ongoing piece of work looking into the root causes of obesity or overweight in this age group.Date of the literature searchThe review included evidence available up until December 2023.Extent of the evidence baseThirty systematic reviews (thorough and detailed reviews of existing literature on a specific topic) of research evidence were identified.Most studies in the reviews were large cohort studies. Studies of this design can identify factors associated with childhood obesity or overweight, but cannot necessarily identify cause-and-effect relationships between the factors studied and childhood obesity or overweight.The USA was the most frequently reported country in which studies were conducted (reported in 21 systematic reviews). Twenty-eight systematic reviews included studies that were conducted in countries where the findings are likely to be broadly transferable to the UK. Thirteen reviews included studies conducted in the UK.Key findings from the evidenceA wide range of biological, psychological, environmental and societal factors were identified as being associated with childhood obesity or overweight. In some cases, multiple studies provided evidence on the relationship between the same factor and overweight and/or obesity. We assessed each individual study for how certain the findings are, and for some factors we found a mixture of high-, moderate-, low-, and very-low certainty evidence.Factors consistently found to be associated with an increased risk of childhood obesity and/or overweight: maternal obesity or overweight; caesarean delivery; babies born larger than expected for their age and sex; babies with catch-up growth during the first two years of life; consumption of food high in sugar, fried or fatty-foods, and fast-food; high dietary diversity (e.g. access to greater variety of energy-dense food might increase food intake); short sleep duration; maternal under-evaluation of a child’s weight; mothers who work (e.g. may rely more on fast foods and children may have more sedentary behaviours), and increasing maternal working hours; children with wealthier parents; maternal attainment of primary school; watching television for more than two hours per day; full-time hours at informal childcare given by grandparents or non-grandparents, or part-time hours at informal childcare given by grandparents.Factors consistently found to be associated with a decreased risk of childhood obesity and/or overweight: breastfeeding; larger household size.Factors with mixed findings on their association with childhood obesity and/or overweight (a mixture of association, which could include an increased risk, decreased risk, and/or no statistically significant association): maternal pre-pregnancy underweight; rapid weight gain during the first zero to two years of life; babies born smaller than expected for their age and sex; prenatal or postnatal antibiotic exposure; baby-led weaning or baby-led introduction to solids; responsive complementary feeding; timing of weaning; dairy consumption (lower-fat milk compared to higher-fat milk); sugar consumption (beverages); maternal attainment of secondary school; maternal smoking during pregnancy.Factors consistently found to have a lack of evidence for an association with childhood obesity and/or overweight: protein consumption; prenatal exposure to bisphenol A (BPA, found in plastics, metal can linings, tickets and receipts); paternal smoking during pregnancy; part-time or an unspecified amount of time at informal childcare given by non-grandparents or an unspecified caregiver; part-time or full-time hours at formal childcare in a childcare centre or nursery.Two qualitative systematic reviews were identified. One of the themes in these reviews was how infant feeding practices are influenced by cultural and family factors. This theme is closely related to the quantitative findings on feeding in infancy, diet in childhood and caregiver behaviour. A second main theme identified in the qualitative evidence was parenting style, which was not closely related to any of the quantitative evidence on factors associated with childhood obesity or overweight.Evidence into practice opportunitiesThe most robust findings are provided by high- or moderate-certainty evidence. However, a mixture of high-, moderate-, low-, and very-low certainty evidence was identified for some factors assessed by multiple studies.The high-certainty evidence supports:– Helping overweight women, who are thinking about having a baby or trying to conceive, to lose weight. Note that there was also low-certainty evidence for this factor reported by some studies.– Reducing rapid weight gain during the first 12 months of life. Note that there was also moderate- and low-certainty evidence for this factor reported by some studies.– Providing opportunities for children of working mothers to access healthier foods and be more physically active, particularly if the mothers work long hours.The moderate-certainty evidence supports:– Promoting breastfeeding.– Reducing rapid weight gain during the first 13 months of life.– Monitoring the child’s growth rate during the first two years of life, particularly of babies with catch-up growth (see Glossary).– Promoting baby-led weaning.– Focusing on reduction of the regular consumption of sugar-containing beverages.– Educating and supporting grandparents and other informal caregivers to provide healthier foods and opportunities for play or physical activity for children.The findings from this review may differ from other reviews conducted to inform practice due to differences in scope. This review only reports on obesity or overweight outcomes where they are measured before the age of five years, whereas previous reviews have measured these outcomes over a wider age range. This review also focusses on evidence that specifically classifies children as overweight or obese using body mass index (or other well-accepted measures for children under two years), whereas other reviews have included a more diffuse range of weight-related outcomes.Research implications and evidence gapsMost of the high-certainty evidence related to childhood overweight. There was some high-certainty evidence related to childhood obesity or overweight, but no high-certainty evidence was identified on the association between factors and childhood obesity specifically. This suggests that more robust studies, clearly reporting methods, outcomes and risk of bias, are needed that investigate factors associated with childhood obesity. Further targeted evidence reviews focusing on the association between individual or specific factors and obesity could confirm this.There is limited evidence regarding obesity or overweight outcomes in children under two years old.There is limited evidence on the role of fathers in the development of childhood obesity or overweight.There is limited qualitative evidence on factors associated with childhood obesity or overweight. There is a need for this to be explored further in a UK setting.Due to the complexity and certainty of the evidence, it is difficult to conclude which factors directly result in the occurrence of childhood obesity or overweight. More experimental studies, which can better establish cause-and-effect relationships between specific factors and childhood obesity or overweight, are needed.Economic considerationsIn the UK, disparities in childhood poverty have been identified as a key factor explaining variation in prevalence of obesity and overweight in children of reception age (four to five years), and local authorities with the greatest proportion of children aged under-five years living in households in receipt of out-of-work benefits have the highest proportion of children aged three to five years who are obese or overweight.Childhood obesity or overweight is positively associated with increased lifetime healthcare resource utilisation.Certainty of evidence The certainty of evidence for this review has been assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach (https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/)Glossary Bias: Systematic (as opposed to random) deviation of the results of a study from the ‘true’ results, which is caused by the way the study is designed or conducted.Catch-up growth: in the first two years after life, a rapid rate of growth after being born small for gestational age or experiencing slow growth after birth. Definitions vary, but two systematic reviews in this rapid review define it as an increase in weight-for-age z-score greater than 0.67 standard deviation units during the first two years of life (from birth to two years).Cohort study: an observational study with two or more groups (cohorts) of people with similar characteristics. One group is exposed to a risk factor and the other group is not. The study records their progress over time and records what happens.Cross-sectional study: A ‘snapshot’ observation of a set of people at one time.Confidence interval: A way of expressing how certain we are about the findings from a study, using statistics. It gives a range of results that is likely to include the ‘true’ value for the population. A wide confidence interval indicates a lack of certainty about the true effect of the test or treatment.Dietary inflammatory potential: refers to the effect of diet on the levels of inflammatory factors in the body.Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE): a common approach to grading the certainty of evidence. Definitions of the certainty of the evidence can be found in Table 1. See www.gradeworkinggroup.org for more information.High-certainty evidence: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.Imprecision: issues such as measuring a treatment effect based on very few patients or effects.Inconsistency of results: unexplained heterogeneity across studies.Indirectness: how applicable the evidence is to the research question and population of interest.Low-certainty evidence: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.Moderate-certainty evidence: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries: A unique forum where the governments of 37 democracies with market-based economies collaborate to develop policy standards to promote sustainable economic growth.P value: a statistical measure that indicates whether or not an effect is statistically significant. By convention, if the p value is below 0.05 (that is, there is less than a 5% probability that the results occurred by chance), it is considered that there probably is a real difference between treatments or other measured effects.Publication bias: Publication bias occurs when researchers publish the results of studies showing that a treatment works well and do not publish those results showing it did not have any effect.Qualitative evidence: explores people’s beliefs, experiences, attitudes, behaviour and interactions. It asks questions about how and why.Quantitative evidence: Research that generates numerical data or data that can be converted into numbers.Rapid review: a systematic review accelerated through streamlining or omitting specific methods.Risk of bias: also called study limitations. Limitations in the study design and execution may bias the estimates of the treatment effect.Statistical significance: A statistically significant result is one that is assessed as being due to a true effect rather than random chance.Study design: whether evidence is from randomised controlled trials, observational studies, or other sourcesSystematic review: a review that summarises the evidence on a clearly formulated review question according to a predefined protocol, using systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and appraise relevant studies, and to extract, analyse, collate and report their findings.Very-low certainty evidence: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors and their Institutions were funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors