RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Estimating the dietary and health impact of implementing mandatory front-of-package nutrient disclosures in the US: a policy scenario modeling analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.10.12.24315377
DO 10.1101/2024.10.12.24315377
A1 Flexner, Nadia
A1 Zaltz, Daniel
A1 Greenthal, Eva
A1 Musicus, Aviva A.
A1 Ahmed, Mavra
A1 L’Abbe, Mary R.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/14/2024.10.12.24315377.abstract
AB Background Recognized as a cost-effective policy to promote healthier diets, mandatory front-of-package labeling (FOPL) identifying foods high in sodium, sugar, and saturated fat has been adopted and implemented in ten countries, and is currently under consideration in several others including the US. However, its potential impact on dietary intake and health have not yet been estimated in the US context.Objectives To estimate (1) the potential dietary impact of implementing mandatory nutrient-specific FOPL among US adults; and (2) the number of diet related non-communicable disease (NCD) deaths that could be averted or delayed due to estimated dietary changes.Methods Baseline and counterfactual dietary intakes of sodium, sugars, saturated fats, and calories were estimated among US adults (n=7,572) using both available days of 24h recall data from the 2017-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The National Cancer Institute method was used to estimate usual intakes and distributions, adjusting for age, sex, misreporting status, weekend/weekday, and sequence of recall. To estimate counterfactual dietary intakes, we modeled reductions observed in experimental and observational studies that examined changes in sodium, sugars, saturated fat and calorie content of food and beverage purchases due to nutrient-specific ‘high in’ FOPL. This study used the Preventable Risk Integrated ModEl (PRIME) to estimate potential health impact.Results Estimated mean dietary reductions of 156 mg and 259 mg/day of sodium, 10.1 g and 7.2 g/day of sugars, 1.08 g and 4.49 g/day of saturated fats, and 38 kcal and 57 kcal/day of calories were observed under the two policy scenarios tested. Between 96,926 (95% UI 89,011-105,284) and 137,261 (95% UI 125,534-148,719) diet related NCD deaths, primarily from cardiovascular diseases (74%), could potentially be averted or delayed by implementing mandatory nutrient-specific FOPL in the US. Overall, more lives would be saved in males than females.Conclusions Findings suggest that implementing mandatory nutrient-specific FOPL in the US could significantly reduce sodium and total sugar intakes among US adults, resulting in a substantial number of NCD related deaths that could be averted or delayed. Our results can inform current food policy developments in the US regarding adoption and implementation of FOPL regulations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.