PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Giguere, Anik MC AU - Bogza, Laura-Mihaela AU - Coudert, Laetitia AU - Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues AU - Renaud, Jean-Sébastien AU - Légaré, France AU - Lindig, Anja AU - Voyer, Philippe TI - Development of the IcanSDM scale to assess primary care clinicians’ ability to adopt shared decision-making AID - 10.1101/2020.07.01.20144204 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.07.01.20144204 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/02/2020.07.01.20144204.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/02/2020.07.01.20144204.full AB - Introduction Implementation of shared decision making (SDM) remains a challenge. To support implementation studies, we sought to develop and validate the IcanSDM scale that assesses clinicians’ perceptions of their ability to adopt SDM.Methods An expert panel reviewed the literature on clinician-reported barriers to SDM adoption, to create an 11-item preliminary scale. A convenience sample of 16 clinicians from Québec (Canada) completed the IcanSDM and the Belief about Capabilities subscale of the CPD-Reaction instrument (BCap), before and after SDM training. We audio-recorded their comments as they completed the scale. We measured IcanSDM’s internal consistency, sensitivity to change and correlation with BCap. Partial correlation coefficients and item analyses suggested removing three items. We then tested the 8-item IcanSDM with a new sample of 17 clinicians.Results In the 11-item IcanSDM version, three items lacked clarity or responsiveness, or showed negative partial correlations with the whole instrument. We thus removed these items. The revised 8-item version gave Cronbach’s alphas of 0.63 before and 0.71 after training, and a 16% improvement in IcanSDM total score after training, compared to before training (p<0.0001). We also found a significant correlation between IcanSDM and the BCap before training (p=0.02), but not after (p=0.46).Discussion IcanSDM is the only instrument measuring this construct. It could thus help bridge the gap in our ability to understand the determinants of clinicians’ SDM behavior intentions and thus help improve SDM implementation impacts and efforts. IcanSDM requires testing with a larger sample to confirm its responsiveness.Lessons for practiceIcanSDM assesses clinicians’ perceived ability to adopt shared decision making.IcanSDM demonstrated adequate validity and reliability but needs more testing to confirm its responsiveness.IcanSDM is promising to assess the impacts of training in shared decision making and other initiatives to implement shared decision making.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was funded by the Ministère de lèÉconomie, de l’Innovation et de l’Exportation du Québec and by the Société de Valorisation (SOVAR) (grant number 2014-2015-PSVT2-31494). We also received in-kind support from the Office of Education and Continuing Professional Development at Laval University and from the VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health. AMCG is funded by Research Scholar Junior 2 Career Development Award by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé. LB is funded by fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. FL is funded by a Tier 1 Canadian Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We obtained ethical approval for this project from the Ethics Review Board of the Ministre de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec (reference CCER15-16-05) and the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (reference 2016-2521). All participants signed an informed consent prior to participation in the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.