RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Ageing and Decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.10.09.24315136
DO 10.1101/2024.10.09.24315136
A1 Ee, Nicole
A1 Brady, Brooke
A1 Sinclair, Craig
A1 Anstey, Kaarin J.
A1 Peters, Ruth
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/09/2024.10.09.24315136.abstract
AB Objectives This systematic review aimed to synthesise the evidence on potential differences in financial, social, health and safety-related decision-making between younger and older adults.Methods Trial, experimental, and prospective studies including older (60+) and younger adults that reported on quantitative decision-making outcome measures (i.e., performance in relation to achieving a specific prespecified goal) were included.Results Decision-making was significantly poorer (i.e., further from prespecified goals) in older compared to younger adults (k = 57, drandom = -0.17, 95% CI -0.29, -0.04, I2 = 92.92%), with high heterogeneity between studies. Age differences were observed for financial and social but not health decision-making domains.Discussion Older adults performed more ‘poorly’ on financial and social decision-making than younger adults. Reasons for observed differences may vary (e.g., different motivation and values) and require exploration in future research. This has implications for how people of different ages are supported, especially at times of important decision-making.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Source data for this review was derived from open-access publications which are referenced in the results section.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.