PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sirard, John R. AU - Sibeko, Lindiwe AU - Pachucki, Mark C. AU - Kitts, James A. TI - The Food, Activity, Screens, and Teens (FAST) Study; Design and protocol AID - 10.1101/2024.10.08.24314237 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.10.08.24314237 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/08/2024.10.08.24314237.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/08/2024.10.08.24314237.full AB - The Food, Activity, Screens, and Teens (FAST) Study was a school-based prospective cohort study, aiming to identify mechanisms of peer influence on weight-related behaviors (WRBs) among early adolescents. In 2017-18, FAST investigators conducted focus group interviews and field observations of sixth grade students at four ethnoracially diverse urban middle schools, then administered pilot surveys in two of the schools. In Fall 2018, investigators recruited a cohort of sixth graders in the same four schools for a three-year panel study, with four waves per year. Each wave measured height and weight, demographic characteristics, WRBs (physical activity, screen time, and dietary patterns), classes and activities, and social networks among peers. Peer network measures included friendship, social sentiments (liking/disliking), online and face to face interaction, kinship, cohabiting, and shared WRBs. The pandemic school closure in March 2020 interrupted fieldwork after wave 6, and the next five waves employed online and mail surveys while schools operated remotely. In Spring 2022, after schools reopened, investigators followed a subset of students into high school to collect a twelfth wave of data.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 1R01HD086259. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB of the University of Massachusetts Amherst gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.