PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Nieva, Harry Reyes AU - Zucker, Jason AU - Tucker, Emma AU - Castor, Delivette AU - Yin, Michael T. AU - Gordon, Peter AU - Elhadad, Noémie TI - Enabling a Learning Public Health System: Enhanced Surveillance of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections AID - 10.1101/2024.04.10.24305612 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.04.10.24305612 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/08/2024.04.10.24305612.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/08/2024.04.10.24305612.full AB - Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to pose a substantial public health challenge in the United States (US). Surveillance, a cornerstone of disease control and prevention, can be strengthened to promote more timely, efficient, and equitable practices by incorporating health information exchange (HIE) and other large-scale health data sources into reporting. New York City patient-level electronic health record data between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2023 were obtained from Healthix, the largest US public HIE. Healthix data were linked to neighborhood-level information from the American Community Survey. In this cross-sectional study, we compared patients who received a test or tested positive for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and/or HIV with patients who were untested or tested negative, respectively, using generalized estimating equations with logit function and robust standard errors. Among 1,519,121 tests performed for chlamydia, 1,574,772 for gonorrhea, and 1,200,560 for HIV, 2%, 0.6% and 0.3% were positive for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and HIV, respectively. Chlamydia and gonorrhea co-occurred in 1,854 cases (7% of chlamydia and 21% of gonorrhea total cases). Testing behavior was often incongruent with geographic and sociodemographic patterns of positive cases. For example, people living in areas with the highest levels of poverty were less likely to test for gonorrhea but almost twice as likely to test positive compared to those in low poverty areas. Regional HIE enabled review of testing and cases using granular and complementary data not typically available given existing reporting practices. Enhanced surveillance spotlights potential incongruencies between testing patterns and STI risk in certain populations, signaling potential under- and over-testing. These and future insights derived from HIE data may be used to continuously inform public health practice and drive further improvements in provision and evaluation of services and programs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health (HRN: T15-LM007079; JZ:K23-AI150378, UM1AI069470) and a Computational and Data Science Fellowship from the Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group in High Performance Computing (HRN).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB of Columbia University Irving Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work (Protocol AAAT1774).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe electronic health record and administrative data underlying this article are not available due to restrictions to preserve patient confidentiality.