PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ge, Yong AU - Zhang, Wenbin AU - Wang, Jianghao AU - Liu, Mengxiao AU - Ren, Zhoupeng AU - Zhang, Xining AU - Zhou, Chenghu AU - Tian, Zhaoxing TI - Effect of different resumption strategies to flatten the potential COVID-19 outbreaks amid society reopens: a modeling study AID - 10.1101/2020.06.25.20140418 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.25.20140418 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/26/2020.06.25.20140418.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/26/2020.06.25.20140418.full AB - The effect of the COVID-19 outbreak has led policymakers around the world to attempt transmission control. However, lockdown and shutdown interventions have caused new social problems and designating policy resumption for infection control when reopening society remains a crucial issue. We investigated the effects of different resumption strategies on COVID-19 transmission using a modeling study setting. We employed a susceptible-exposed-infectious-removed model to simulate COVID-19 outbreaks under five reopening strategies based on China’s business resumption progress. The effect of each strategy was evaluated using the peak values of the epidemic curves vis-à-vis confirmed active cases and cumulative cases. We found that a hierarchy-based reopen strategy performed best when current epidemic prevention measures were maintained save for lockdown, reducing the peak number of active cases and cumulative cases by 50% and 44%, respectively. However, the modeled effect of each strategy decreased when the current intervention was lifted somewhat. Additional attention should be given to regions with significant numbers of migrants, as the potential risk of COVID-19 outbreaks amid society reopening is intrinsically high. Business resumption strategies have the potential to eliminate COVID-19 outbreaks amid society reopening without special control measures. The proposed resumption strategies focused mainly on decreasing the number of imported exposure cases, guaranteeing medical support for epidemic control, or decreasing active cases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThere is no funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:It is unnecessary for this study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis study is mainly a simulation study. All data are available on the website of Beijing's CDC.