PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sanchez, Thomas AU - Mihailov, Angeline AU - Koob, Mériam AU - Girard, Nadine AU - Manchon, Aurélie AU - Valenzuela, Ignacio AU - Gómez-Chiari, Marta AU - Martí Juan, Gerard AU - Pron, Alexandre AU - Eixarch, Elisenda AU - Piella, Gemma AU - González Ballester, Miguel A. AU - Camara, Oscar AU - Dunet, Vincent AU - Auzias, Guillaume AU - Bach Cuadra, Meritxell TI - Biometry and volumetry in multi-centric fetal brain MRI: assessing the bias of super-resolution reconstruction AID - 10.1101/2024.09.23.24313965 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.09.23.24313965 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/29/2024.09.23.24313965.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/29/2024.09.23.24313965.full AB - Background Super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) of fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to enable the development of new imaging biomarkers to better study in utero neurodevelopment. However, potential biases in 2D biometric and 3D volumetric measurements due to different SRR techniques remain understudied.Purpose To assess the consistency of biometric and volumetric measurements across three hospitals using three widely used SRR pipelines.Materials and Methods This retrospective study used T2-weighted (T2w) fetal brain MRI scans acquired in routine clinical practice at three hospitals. MRIs from each subject were reconstructed with each of the 3 SRR methods. Four experts did biometric measurements on each SRR volume blinded to the method used. Automated 3D volumetry was performed using a state-of-the-art segmentation method. A univariate analysis was first carried out with Friedman tests with post-hoc Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and results were confirmed in a multivariate analysis accounting for the effect of gestational age and different raters, using a t-distributed generalized additive model. An additional qualitative evaluation was performed to assess how likely clinicians would be to use the current SRR volumes in their practice, and whether they would prefer it to low-resolution T2w acquisitions. Differences were assessed with Friedman tests and post-hoc Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.Results 84 healthy subjects were included in three gestational age groups ([21-28): 25.4±1.9, [28-32): 29.3±1.3, [32-36): 33.5±1.2). Statistically significant differences in biometric measurements were found, but consistently remained below voxel width (0.8 mm). Automated 3D volumetry revealed systematic but very small effects (<2.8%). The qualitative evaluation showed systematic differences between SRR methods for the perception of white matter intensity (p=0.02) and sharpness of the image (p=0.01).Conclusion Variations in 2D and 3D quantitative measurements did not show any large systematic bias when using different SRR methods for radiological assessment in clinical routine across multiple centers, scanners, and raters.Summary Different super-resolution reconstruction methods for fetal brain MRI volumes lead to negligible variations in 2D or 3D quantitative measurements; this may help achieve larger sample sizes in prenatal development studies.Key Results- In this multi-centric retrospective study, 252 super-resolution reconstructions (SRR) scans from 84 healthy subjects showed negligible variations in 2D in biometric measures (below the voxel with of 0.8 mm; p<0.001).- 3D measurements revealed small variations ranging from 0.8 % in supratentorial tissues (p<0.001) to 2.8% in the extra-cerebral cerebrospinal fluid (p<0.001).- Clinicians favored having both low resolution and SRR volumes available.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by Era-net NEURON MULTIFACT project (TS: Swiss National Science Foundation grant 31NE30_203977; AM, GA: French National Research Agency, Grant ANR-21-NEU2-0005; IV, EE: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) grant AC21_2/00016, GM, MG, OC, GP: Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities: MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/), and the SulcalGRIDS Project, (GA: French National Research Agency Grant ANR-19-CE45-0014).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study received ethical approval from each center's institutional review board: Lausanne University Hospital: CER-VD 2021-00124; La Timone: Aix-Marseille University No.2022-04-14-003, Hospital Clinic Barcelona: HCB/2022/0533.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors LRLow-resolutionGAGestational AgeSRRSuper-resolution reconstructionUSUltrasoundT2wT2-weighted contrastLCCLength of the corpus callosumHVVermis HeightbBIPBrain biparietal diametersBIPSkull biparietal diameterTCDTransverse cerebellar diameter