RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Predicting Mobile Health Clinic Utilization for COVID-19 Vaccination in South Carolina: A Statistical Framework for Strategic Resource Allocation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.27.24314475
DO 10.1101/2024.09.27.24314475
A1 Gezer, Fatih
A1 Howard, Kerry A.
A1 Bennett, Kevin J.
A1 Litwin, Alain H.
A1 Sease, Kerry K.
A1 Rennert, Lior
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/29/2024.09.27.24314475.abstract
AB Background Mobile health clinics (MHCs) are effective tools for providing health services to disadvantaged populations, especially during health emergencies. However, patient utilization of MHC services varies substantially. Strategies to increase utilization are therefore needed to maximize the effectiveness of MHC services by serving more patients in need. The purpose of this study is to develop a statistical framework to identify and prioritize high-risk communities for delivery of MHCs during health emergencies.Methods Prisma Health MHCs delivered COVID-19 vaccines to communities throughout South Carolina between February 20, 2021, and February 17, 2022. In this retrospective study, we use generalized linear mixed effects model and ordinal logistic regression model to identify factors associated with, and predict, MHC utilization for COVID-19 vaccination by census tract.Results The MHCs conducted 260 visits to 149 sites and 107 census tracts. The site-level analysis showed that visits to schools (RR=2.17, 95% CI=1.47-3.21), weekend visits (RR=1.38, 95% CI=1.03-1.83), and visits when the resources were limited (term 1: 7.11, 95% CI=4.43-11.43) and (term 2: 2.40, 95% CI=1.76-3.26) were associated with greater MHC utilization for COVID-19 vaccination. MHC placement near existing vaccination centers (RR=0.79, 95% CI=0.68-0.93) and hospitals (RR=0.83, 95% CI=0.71-0.96) decreased utilization. Predictive models identified 1,227 (94.7%) census tracts with more than 250 individuals per MHC visit when vaccine resources were limited. Predictions showed satisfactory accuracy (72.6%). The census tracts with potential of high MHC demand had higher adolescent, 30-44 years old, non-White populations, lower Primary Care Practitioners per 1,000 residents, fewer hospitals, and higher cumulative COVID-19 emergency department visits and deaths (compared to census tracts in the low MHC demand category). After the vaccines became widely available, the demand at MHCs declined.Conclusion These study findings can be used to improve MHC allocation by identifying and prioritizing medically underserved communities for strategic delivery of these limited resources.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health and the Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The MHC program was supported by The Greenville County CARES Program as part of a COVID-19 Funding Program. LR, KJB, AHL, and KKS received support from the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health (R01LM014193) during this study LR, FG, KAH, KJB, AHL, and KKS received support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NU38FT000011) during this study. The funders had no role in the design, conduct, reporting of the study, or decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was reviewed and approved by the IRB of Clemson UniversityI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesCommunity level datasets are publicly available and obtained from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index, the United States Census Bureau American Community Survey and American Hospital Directory. https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP5Y2021.DP05?q=acs%202021&g=040XX00US45 https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/data_documentation_download.html https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/medicine/centers_and_institutes_new/center_for_rural_and_primary_healthcare/index.php