RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.27.24314505
DO 10.1101/2024.09.27.24314505
A1 Gaber, Farieda
A1 Shaik, Maqsood
A1 Franke, Vedran
A1 Akalin, Altuna
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/28/2024.09.27.24314505.abstract
AB Accurate medical decision-making is critical for both patients and clinicians. Patients often struggle to interpret their symptoms, determine their severity, and select the right specialist. Simultaneously, clinicians face challenges in integrating complex patient data to make timely, accurate diagnoses. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer the potential to bridge this gap by supporting decision-making for both patients and healthcare providers. In this study, we benchmark multiple LLM versions and an LLM-based workflow incorporating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) on a curated dataset of 2,000 medical cases derived from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database. Our findings show that these LLMs are capable of providing personalized insights into likely diagnoses, suggesting appropriate specialists, and assessing urgent care needs. These models may also support clinicians in refining diagnoses and decision-making, offering a promising approach to improving patient outcomes and streamlining healthcare delivery.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAA and MS were supported by Helmholtz KA-TVP-60 grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data data set is available freely under https://physionet.org/content/mimic-iv-note/2.2/ and https://physionet.org/content/mimic-iv-ed/2.2/.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data will be available in pyhsioNet, we are in the process of submission. The core data set is available freely under https://physionet.org/content/mimic-iv-note/2.2/ and https://physionet.org/content/mimic-iv-ed/2.2/.