RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Impact of Losartan on Portal hypertension and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.25.24314392
DO 10.1101/2024.09.25.24314392
A1 Avasthi, Deepti
A1 Avasthi, Salil
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/27/2024.09.25.24314392.abstract
AB Background Portal hypertension, a complication of chronic liver disease, results from elevated pressure between the portal vein and the inferior vena cava. While non-selective beta-blockers are established for reducing portal pressure, the efficacy of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, remains debated. This study evaluated losartan’s impact on portal pressure and clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.Objectives To appraise evidence on the role of losartan in reducing portal pressure and associated clinical outcomes in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension.Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science. All the research and review of literature was conducted within the time period from August 20th, 2024 till August 31st, 2024 (within 1 month of submission of the paper). The Risk of Bias Visualization Tool (Robvis 2.0) and ROBINS-I were used to assess study quality. Data was extracted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel.Results Among 426 potential studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Both losartan and propranolol reduced hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), with some studies suggesting a more pronounced effect of losartan. Meta-analysis found no significant difference in HVPG reduction (p = 0.22), but losartan significantly reduced wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) compared to propranolol (p = 0.03). Losartan also affected mean arterial pressure, renal function, and hepatic fibrosis.Conclusions Losartan shows potential in treating portal hypertension by reducing portal pressure and fibrosis. It may be particularly beneficial for patients unresponsive to beta-blockers, addressing both hemodynamic and structural components, and improving sodium handling in complex cases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared that no competing interests exist.Clinical TrialnaClinical Protocols naga Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:naI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.na