PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Melyda, Melyda AU - Monahan, Mark AU - Bird, Chris AU - Roberts, Tracy AU - Harper, Lorraine AU - Litchfield, Ian TI - Integrating health care and early years support for children and young people living in deprivation: A cost effectiveness analysis of a novel integrated clinic in Birmingham, UK AID - 10.1101/2024.09.26.24314416 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.09.26.24314416 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/26/2024.09.26.24314416.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/26/2024.09.26.24314416.full AB - Background Increased use of emergency and secondary care by children and young people, especially in deprived populations, drive increased costs in health and social care systems in rich country settings, without necessarily delivering quality care.Aim To assess the potential cost-effectiveness of the Sparkbrook’s Children Zone (SCZ), a pilot clinic for children and young people which integrates health and early years support in a highly deprived area of Birmingham, the UK’s second city, compared with standard primary care.Methods A decision-analytic model taking healthcare and partial social care perspective was developed using best available, though limited, evidence from aggregated data of an ongoing pilot, published literature, expert opinions and assumptions. Effectiveness was measured as proportion of patients attending the emergency department. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of parameter uncertainties.Results The integrated SCZ clinic may potentially be cost-effective based on this preliminary model-based analysis. The SCZ had lower proportion of patients attending emergency department, 0.017 compared with 0.029 for standard primary care, reducing proportion of emergency department visits by 0.012. The average cost of SCZ was £66.22 compared with £110.36 for standard primary care, leading to a cost-saving of £44.08 per patient. This potential reduction in total costs resulting from fewer referrals to children’s social care and secondary medical services, including the emergency department. Extensive sensitivity analysis supported the indications that the intervention was likely to be cost-effective.Conclusion The SCZ pilot shows potential in integrating health and social care within a community setting, with Its early years services likely enhancing the cost-effectiveness of the SCZ compared to standard primary care. Further robust data and trial evaluation are essential to confirm these findings, ensuring the scalability and sustainability of such programs.Competing Interest StatementAll authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form. CB declare receiving funding from the Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust. IL and LH declare receiving funding by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust for this study, paid to their institution. All other authors declare no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted workFunding StatementThis study was funded by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation TrustAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Birmingham Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll reasonable data requests should be submitted to the lead author (m.melyda{at}bham.ac.uk)