RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Characterization of motor function recovery using muscle synergies in stroke patients undergoing upper limb rehabilitation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.24.24314287
DO 10.1101/2024.09.24.24314287
A1 Pregnolato, Giorgia
A1 Severini, Giacomo
A1 Maistrello, Lorenza
A1 Rimini, Daniele
A1 Lencioni, Tiziana
A1 Carpinella, Ilaria
A1 Ferrarin, Maurizio
A1 Jonsdottir, Johanna
A1 Cheung, Vincent C. K.
A1 Turolla, Andrea
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/25/2024.09.24.24314287.abstract
AB In stroke rehabilitation, muscle synergies have been investigated to provide information on the level of upper limb motor impairment, but not yet for explaining motor recovery after therapy. In this study, we analysed muscle synergies parameters extracted from 62 people with stroke who underwent a specific upper limb treatment (20 sessions, 1h/day, 5d/week, 4 weeks) consisting of virtual reality, robotic or conventional treatment. Overall, participants improved upper limb motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity-FMA-UE: Δ= 7.14 ± 7.46, p< 0.001) but the number of muscle synergies of the impaired side (N-aff) did not change after treatment (N-aff: T0= 8.8 ± 1.5; T1=8.7 ± 1.4; p=0.374). Then, we stratified the sample into Responder (No.=34) and Non-Responder (No.=28) participants, based on the Minimal Clinical Important Difference value of FMA-UE (Δ >5 points). We investigated merging and fractionation indexes in both subgroups and only the Responder subgroup significantly decreased the percentage of merged muscle synergies (p=0.004). No significant changes in the fractionation index resulted in either subgroup.Finally, we identified vocabularies of affected upper limb motor synergies, before (No. 13 synergies) and after treatment (No. 14 synergies), and in unaffected upper limb (No. 16 synergies). We identified upper limb motor functions associated with each muscle synergy in each vocabulary based on the muscles represented in the muscle synergy. There were no differences in motor functions characterizing Responder patients. However, after therapy, both Responder and Non-Responder subgroups were characterized by the same distribution of motor functions across muscle synergies observed in the unaffected limb.Trial registration The trial is registered in ClinicalTrial.gov, identifier number NCT03530358 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03530358).Key messagesRehabilitation therapy for the upper limb induces reduction of muscle synergies merging in people with stroke expressing clinically important improvement of motor function. This muscular pattern is in accordance with motor control mechanisms underpinning functional recovery.Motor function of the affected upper limb at baseline did not characterize the muscular profile of patients responding to rehabilitation treatment (Responder).After therapy, all patients regardless the amount of motor function improvement (i.e., Responder, Non-Responder) express a muscular profile of the affected upper limb like the unaffected upper limb.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialClinical Trial ID NCT03530358Clinical Protocols https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03530358 Funding StatementThis publication has emanated from research supported under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101034252. AT and TL were sustained by the Italian Ministry of Health (Grant Agreement No. GR-2011-02348942 and No. RF-2019-12371486). VCKC was supported by Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (Project No. R4022-18 [RIF], N-CUHK456/21 [NSFC-RGC], 14114721 [GRF], and 14119022 [GRF] to V.C.K.C.). TL, IC, MF and JJ were supported by the European Union-NextGenerationEU (Project RAISE-Robotics and AI for Socio-economic Empowerment).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Clinical Experimentation (CESC) of Venice and San Camillo IRCCS hospital (Prot. No. 2015.14) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.