PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Rudberg, Ann-Sofie AU - Havervall, Sebastian AU - Månberg, Anna AU - Falk, August Jernbom AU - Aguilera, Katherina AU - Ng, Henry AU - Gabrielsson, Lena AU - Salomonsson, Ann-Christine AU - Hanke, Leo AU - Murrell, Benjamin AU - McInerney, Gerald AU - Olofsson, Jennie AU - Andersson, Eni AU - Hellström, Cecilia AU - Bayati, Shaghayegh AU - Bergström, Sofia AU - Pin, Elisa AU - Sjöberg, Ronald AU - Tegel, Hanna AU - Hedhammar, My AU - Phillipson, Mia AU - Nilsson, Peter AU - Hober, Sophia AU - Thålin, Charlotte TI - SARS-CoV-2 exposure, symptoms and seroprevalence in health care workers AID - 10.1101/2020.06.22.20137646 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.22.20137646 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/23/2020.06.22.20137646.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/23/2020.06.22.20137646.full AB - Background SARS-CoV-2 may pose an occupational health risk to health care workers, but the prevalence of infections in this population is unknown. We examined the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among health care workers at a large acute care hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. We determined correlations between seroprevalence, self-reported symptoms and occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2.Methods and findings All employees at Danderyd Hospital (n=4375) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study. 2149 employees from all hospital departments were enrolled in the study between April 14th and May 8th 2020. Study participants completed a questionnaire consisting of symptoms compatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection since January 2020 and occupational exposure to patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed using a multiplex assay evaluated to have 99.4% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity. The over-all seroprevalence among 2149 participants was 19.1% (n=410). There was no difference in age or sex between seropositive and seronegative participants. The symptoms with the strongest correlation to seroprevalence were anosmia and ageusia, with odds ratios of 28.4 (p=2.02*10^-120) and 19.2 (p=1.67*10^-99) respectively. Seroprevalence was strongly associated with patient-related work (OR 2.9, p=4.24*10^-8), covid-19 patient contact (OR 1.43, p=0.003), and occupation as assisting nurse (OR 3.67, p=2.16*10^-9).Conclusion These results demonstrate that anosmia and ageusia should be included in screening guidance and in the recommendations of self-isolation to reduce further spread of SARS-CoV-2. The results furthermore imply an occupational health risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection among hospital workers. Continued measures are warranted to assure healthcare worker safety and reduce transmission from health care settings to the community during the covid-19 outbreak.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by Region Stockholm, Knut & Alice Wallenberg foundation, Erling-Persson family foundation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SciLifeLab, Christian and Jennifer Dahlberg, Atlas Copco, the Swedish Research Council, and EU grant (CoroNab).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study complied with the declaration of Helsinki, and informed consent was obtained on all participants. The study protocol was approved by the Stockholm Ethical Review Board (dnr 2020-01653).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesYes