RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes in Oman during COVID19: Frontline vs Non-frontline Healthcare Workers
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.23.20138032
DO 10.1101/2020.06.23.20138032
A1 Alshekaili, Muna
A1 Hassan, Walid
A1 Al-Said, Nazik
A1 alsulimani, Fatima
A1 Kumar, Satish
A1 Al-Mawali, Adhra
A1 Chan, Moon Fai
A1 Mahadevan, Sangeetha
A1 Al-Adawi, Samir
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/23/2020.06.23.20138032.abstract
AB OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess and compare demographic and psychological factors and sleep status of frontline HCWs in relation to non-frontline HCWsDESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey from the 8th to the 17th of April 2020 across varied health care settings in Oman accruing 1139 HCWS.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mental health status was assessed using Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21), and insomnia was evaluated by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Samples were categorized into the frontline and non-frontline groups. Chi-square, odds ratio, and independent t-tests were used to compare groups by demographic and mental health outcomes.Results This study included 1139 HCWs working in Oman. There was a total of 368 (32.3%), 388 (34.1%), 271 (23.8%), and 211 (18.5%) respondents reported to have depression, anxiety, stress, and insomnia, respectively while working during the pandemic period. HCWs in the frontline group were 1.4 times more likely to have anxiety (OR=1.401, p=0.007) and stress (OR=1.404, p=0.015) as compared to those working in the non-frontline group. On indices of sleep-wake cycles, HCWs in the frontline group were 1.37 times more likely to report insomnia (OR=1.377, p=0.037) when compared to those working in the non-frontline group. No significant differences in depression status between workers in the frontline and non-frontline groups were found (p=0.181).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the differential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on different grades of HCWs. This study suggests that frontline HCWs are disproportionally affected compared to non-frontline HCWs. The problem with managing sleep-wake cycles and anxiety symptoms were highly endorsed among frontline HCWs. As psychosocial interventions are likely to be constrained owing to the pandemic, mental health care must first be directed to frontline HCWs.Article SummaryMethodsThe study accrued 1139 participants of which 574 were working as frontline HCWs (565 non-frontline workers) serving patients with COVID-19 in different categories of healthcare settings in Oman.The following tools used were used alongside the collection of demographic information: The depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Insomnia Severity Index.Strengths: This nationally representative study is the first of its kind to investigate the differences in magnitude and the covariates of stress and distress between frontline and non-frontline healthcare workers in Oman.Limitations: The use of an online survey and the use of symptom checklists (DASS, ISI) which are typically no match for the ‘gold-standard’ interviews.It is also not clear whether the observed mental health outcomes constitute adjustment disorders/ acute stress reaction or present a chronic-type and thus irreversible psychological distress.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained before the commencement of the study from the local IRB, Directorate General of Planning and Studies, Centre of Studies and Research, Ministry of Health (MOH/ DGPS/CSR/20/2311)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated and analysed during this study are included as part of this article.