PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Onoya, Dorina AU - Sineke, Tembeka AU - Mokhele, Idah AU - Vujovic, Marnie AU - Holland, Kate AU - Ruiter, Robert A.C. TI - Improving Retention and HIV Viral Suppression: A Cluster Randomised Pilot Trial of a Lay Counsellor Motivational Interviewing Training in South Africa AID - 10.1101/2024.09.20.24314048 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.09.20.24314048 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/23/2024.09.20.24314048.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/23/2024.09.20.24314048.full AB - We piloted a Motivational Interviewing (MI) training program for lay counsellors in South Africa (SA) to assess its impact on retention and viral suppression among newly diagnosed individuals living with HIV (PLHIV) at 12 months post-diagnosis. We randomized eight primary healthcare clinics (PHC) in Johannesburg to either the intervention clinics (n=4) where all lay counsellors were supported for 12 months before the PLHIV enrolment or the standard of care (n=4 clinics). Overall, 548 adults (≥ 18 years) PLHIV were recruited after HIV diagnosis from March 2020 to August 2021 (n=291 intervention, n=257 control). We conducted Poisson regression modelling to assess the intervention effect on patient attendance status (out of care – being ≥28 days late for the last appointment) and viral suppression (<50 copies/ml) at 12 months, reporting risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of the 548 eligible participants enrolled, 56.3% were ≥28 days late (52.9% intervention vs 60.9% controls, RR 0.9, 95% CI: 0.7-1.0). Retention at 12 months positively correlated with baseline counselor MI skill levels (Cultivating change talk, RR 1.6, 95%CI: 1.1-2.5; Softening sustain talk, RR 1.5, 95%CI: 0.8-2.9; Empathy, RR 1.4, 95%CI: 1.0-1.8; Partnership RR 1.5, 95%CI: 1.2-1.9). Among those retained at 12 months, 65.3% of intervention participants were virally suppressed compared to 49.3% controls (RR 1.3, 95%CI: 1.0-1.7). Compared to control participants, the intervention group reported more positive counseling experiences, fewer concerns about HIV disclosure (RR 0.8 for high vs low-medium concerns, 95% CI: 0.7–1.0) and ART (RR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7–1.0), and were more likely to express high confidence to take treatment in public (47.4% vs 28.8%, RR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0–1.8) after counselling.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialPACTR202212796722256Funding StatementThis study has been made possible by the generous support of the American People and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of Cooperative Agreement 72067419CA00004 to the Wits Health Consortium. DO, TS and KS were also supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health 1R01AI152149. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of PEPFAR, USAID, NIH or the United States Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Witwatersrand (Wits HREC: M170579) and also by the Gauteng Provincial Department of Health (reference: GP_201711_028).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data and with permission from the owners of the data. Contact the organization at information@heroza.org for additional information regarding data access.