PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Zhu, Joshua AU - Destito, Michela AU - Dhanireddy, Chitanya AU - Hager, Tommy AU - Hossain, Sajid AU - Chadha, Saahil AU - Sritharan, Durga AU - Dhawan, Anish AU - Kandala, Keervani AU - Pedersen, Christian AU - Anzalone, Nicoletta AU - Calimeri, Teresa AU - De Momi, Elena AU - Spadea, Maria Francesca AU - Aboian, Mariam S. AU - Aneja, Sanjay TI - Deriving Imaging Biomarkers for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Deep Learning AID - 10.1101/2024.09.16.24313435 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.09.16.24313435 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/18/2024.09.16.24313435.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/18/2024.09.16.24313435.full AB - Purpose Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is typically treated with chemotherapy, steroids, and/or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Identifying which patients benefit from WBRT following chemotherapy, and which patients can be adequately treated with chemotherapy alone remains a persistent clinical challenge. Although WBRT is associated with improved outcomes, it also carries a risk of neuro-cognitive side effects. This study aims to refine patient phenotyping for PCNSL by leveraging deep learning (DL) extracted imaging biomarkers to enable personalized therapy.Methods Our study included 71 patients treated at our institution between 2009-2021. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) assessed at one-year, two-year, and median cohort survival cutoffs. The DL model leveraged an 8-layer 2D convolutional neural network which analyzed individual slices of post-contrast T1-weighted pre-treatment MRI scans. Survival predictions were made using a weighted voting system related to tumor size. Model performance was assessed with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 scores. Time-dependent AUCs were calculated and C-statistics were computed to summarize the results. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis assessed differences between low and high-risk groups and statistically evaluated using the log-rank test. External validation of our model was performed with a cohort of 40 patients from an external institution.Results The cohort’s average age was 65.6 years with an average OS of 2.80 years. The one-year, two-year, and median OS models achieved AUCs of 0.73 (95% C.I., 0.60-0.85), 0.70 (95% C.I., 0.58-0.82), and 0.73 (95% C.I., 0.58-0.82) respectively. KM survival curves showcased discrimination between low and high-risk groups in all models. External validation with our one-year model achieved AUC of 0.64 (95% C.I., 0.63-0.65) and significant risk discrimination. A sub-analysis showcased stable model performance across different tumor volumes and focality.Conclusions DL classifiers of PCNSL MRIs can stratify patient phenotypes beyond traditional risk paradigms. Given dissensus surrounding PCNSL treatment, DL can augment risk stratification and treatment personalization, especially with regards to WBRT decision making.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Yale University waived ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.