RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reliable Online Auditory Cognitive Testing: An observational study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.17.24313794
DO 10.1101/2024.09.17.24313794
A1 Lad, Meher
A1 Taylor, John-Paul
A1 Griffiths, Tim D
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/17/2024.09.17.24313794.abstract
AB Technological advances have allowed researchers to conduct research remotely. Online auditory testing has received interest since the Covid-19 pandemic. A number of web-based developments have improved the range of auditory tasks during remote participation. Most of these studies have been conducted in young, motivated individuals who are comfortable with technology. Such studies have also used stimuli testing auditory perceptual abilities. Research on auditory cognitive abilities in real-world older adults is lacking.In this study, we assess the reproducibility of a range of auditory cognitive abilities in older adults, with a range of hearing abilities, who took part in in-person and online experiments. Participants performed a questionnaire-based assessment and were asked to complete two verbal speech-in-noise perception tasks, for digits and sentences, and two auditory memory tasks, for different sound features. In the first part of the study, 58 Participants performed these tests in-person and online in order to test the reproducibility of the tasks. In the second part, 147 participants conducted all the tasks online in order to test if previously published findings from in-person research were reproducible.We found that older adults under the age of 70 and those with a better hearing were more likely to take part in online testing. The questionnaire-based test had significantly better reproducibility than the behavioural auditory tests but there were no differences in reproducibility between in-person and online auditory cognitive metrics. Relationships between relationships with age and hearing thresholds in an in-person or online setting were not significantly different.Furthermore, important relationships between auditory metrics, evidenced in literature previously, were reproducible online.This study suggests that auditory cognitive testing may be reliably conducted online.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Newcastle NIHR Biomedical Research Centre supported the study. ML has received funding from the National Institute of Health Research, Alzheimer's Research UK, the Guarantors of Brain and Medical Research Council (MR/V006568/1) in the United Kingdom. JT receives funding from the National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom in Newcastle upon Tyne. TG receives funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/T032553/1), Wellcome Trust (WT106964MA) and National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC000242 36).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Oxford C NHS Research Ethics Committee (21/SC/0139) approved this study on the 12th of June 2021. All participants gave written consent to participate and publish data.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData and analysis code is available from OSF.