RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Sustainable integration of a vertical voluntary medical male circumcision program into routine health services in Zimbabwe: A mixed methods evaluation of a participatory change intervention
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.06.24313083
DO 10.1101/2024.09.06.24313083
A1 Chung, Amanda Marr
A1 Murungu, Joseph
A1 Chitapi, Precious
A1 Chikodzore, Rudo
A1 Case, Peter
A1 Gosling, Jonathan
A1 Gosling, Roly
A1 Xaba, Sinokuthemba
A1 Ncube, Getrude
A1 Mugurungi, Owen
A1 Kunaka, Patience
A1 Bertozzi, Stefano M.
A1 Feldacker, Caryl
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/11/2024.09.06.24313083.abstract
AB The global health community has recognized the importance of integrating and sustaining health programs and forming equitable partnerships. Corresponding with these objectives, international aid donors are embracing the principle of localization. The Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) in Zimbabwe is a large vertical HIV prevention program primarily funded through development assistance for health. Program stakeholders want to sustainably integrate VMMC into routine health services so that the program will continue to be a cost-effective HIV prevention strategy through 2030. The purpose of this paper is to describe a bottom-up process of sustainably integrating the program into routine health services through an approach that empowers local stakeholders. At the district level, we facilitated changes to accelerate integration and sustainability. To evaluate our intervention, we used a mixed methods design comprising analysis of district-level work plans with qualitative and quantitative indicators, combined with a survey assessing sustainability capacity of the program, administered at midline and endline to district teams. In all five pilot districts we facilitated the transition of VMMC into the government’s district administration, resulting in a locally owned and managed program, while also strengthening individual and team capacity. We observed improvements across all World Health Organization health system building blocks, suggesting that the intervention strengthened the overall health system. The sustainability survey showed a reduction in funding stability but a significant increase in communications, program adaptation, and organizational capacity. Compared to traditional top-down change initiatives, the participatory approach to integration was an effective way of addressing specific VMMC challenges at the district level whilst maintaining management and oversight at provincial and national levels. Other health programs in low- and middle-income countries seeking to integrate and sustain health services at subnational levels should consider this diagonal, bottom-up model to promote local leadership development and health system strengthening.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by Gates Foundation grant INV-002137.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We obtained ethical approval from the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (A2670), Research Council of Zimbabwe, and the University of California San Francisco Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board (20-39761). Ethical approval was given by all three entities.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.