RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evolving cartilage strain with pain progression and gait: a longitudinal study post-ACL reconstruction at six and twelve months
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.08.24313289
DO 10.1101/2024.09.08.24313289
A1 Miller, Emily Y.
A1 Lowe, Timothy
A1 Zhu, Hongtian
A1 Lee, Woowon
A1 Argote, Pablo F.
A1 Dresdner, Danielle
A1 Kelly, James
A1 Frank, Rachel M.
A1 McCarty, Eric
A1 Bravman, Jonathan
A1 Stokes, Daniel
A1 Emery, Nancy C.
A1 Neu, Corey P.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/09/2024.09.08.24313289.abstract
AB Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions often resulting in long-term degenerative outcomes such as osteoarthritis (OA). Despite surgical advances in ACL reconstruction, a significant number of patients develop OA within ten years post-surgery, providing a patient population that may present early markers of cartilage degeneration detectable using noninvasive imaging.Purpose This study aims to investigate the temporal evolution of cartilage strain and relaxometry post-ACL reconstruction using displacement under applied loading MRI and quantitative MRI. Specifically, we examined the correlations between MRI metrics and pain, as well as knee loading patterns during gait, to identify early candidate markers of cartilage degeneration.Materials and Methods Twenty-five participants (female/male = 15/10; average age = 25.6 yrs) undergoing ACL reconstruction were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal cohort study between 2022 and 2023. MRI scans were conducted at 6- and 12-months post-surgery, assessing T2, T2*, and T1ρ relaxometry values, and intratissue cartilage strain. Changes in pain were evaluated using standard outcome scores, and gait analysis assessed the knee adduction moment (KAM). Regressions were performed to evaluate relationships between MRI metrics in cartilage contact regions, patient-reported pain, and knee loading metrics.Results Increases in axial and transverse strains in the tibial cartilage were significantly correlated with increased pain, while decreases in shear strain were associated with increased pain. Changes in strain metrics were also significantly related to KAM at12 months.Conclusions Changes in cartilage strain and relaxometry are related to heightened pain and altered knee loading patterns, indicating potential early markers of osteoarthritis progression. These findings underscore the importance of using advanced MRI for early monitoring in ACL-reconstructed patients to optimize treatment outcomes, while also highlighting KAM as a modifiable intervention through gait retraining that may positively impact the evolution of cartilage health and patient pain.Key ResultsIncreased axial and transverse strains in the tibial cartilage from 6 to 12 months post-ACL reconstruction were significantly correlated with increased pain, suggesting evolving changes in cartilage biomechanical properties over time.Decreases in shear strain in inner femoral and central tibial cartilage regions were linked to increased pain, indicating alterations in joint loading patterns.Decreases in shear strain in the inner femoral cartilage were significantly associated with decreased 12-month knee adduction moment (KAM), a surrogate for medial cartilage knee loading during walking.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFinancial support was provided by the National Institutes of Health (2 R01 AR063712 and AR063712S1).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Colorado IRB approved the study, and all participants gave informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.