RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Are specific, measurable, action-oriented, realistic, and time-bound (SMART) goals associated with improved walking outcomes for stroke survivors undergoing outpatient stroke rehabilitation? An observational cross-sectional retrospective cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.05.24313054
DO 10.1101/2024.09.05.24313054
A1 Mohammadi-Ghayeghchi, Helia
A1 Bhagat, Nidhi
A1 Campbell, Mackenzie
A1 Mayhew, Madi
A1 Dufresne, Rheall
A1 Ewald, Levi
A1 Devasahayam, Augustine J.
A1 Mansfield, Avril
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/06/2024.09.05.24313054.abstract
AB Background Goal-setting is a core principle used in clinical practice to guide treatment. Setting goals improves adherence to rehabilitation treatments and may lead to better outcomes in people with neurological disorders. However, there is a lack of research into the prevalence of goals using a Specific, Measurable, Action-Oriented, Realistic, and Time-Bound (SMART) framework. Additionally, it is currently unclear if the SMART framework improves ambulatory outcomes in outpatient stroke rehabilitation.Methods This observational, cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study reviewed charts of all patients admitted to outpatient stroke rehabilitation at three hospitals over a 1-year period. Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented ambulatory goals. Goals were classified as either SMART or non-SMART. Analysis of covariance was used to compare Functional Ambulation Category scores at discharge between the SMART and non-SMART groups, controlling for admission scores, length of stay, and time post-stroke.Results 300 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 61 (20.3%) had at least one SMART ambulatory goal. Analysis of covariance revealed a statistically significantly greater Functional Ambulation Category scores at discharge for the SMART goal group compared to the non-SMART group (mean Functional Ambulation Category scores at discharge [95% confidence interval], SMART group: 4.2 [4.0, 4.5], non-SMART group: 3.8 [3.6, 4.1]; F1,60 = 4.40, p = 0.043).Conclusion The use of SMART goals in outpatient stroke rehabilitation is associated with better ambulatory outcomes compared to non-SMART goals. These findings suggest that incorporating the SMART framework in clinical practice can enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for stroke patients. Further studies are recommended to explore the long-term effects and broader applications of SMART goal-setting.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT 173472).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the University Health Network (protocol number: 20-5695) and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (protocol number: 36050) Research Ethics Boards.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesIndividual-participant data are not available publicly due to privacy legislation.