RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Introduction to and spread of COVID-19 in care homes in Norfolk, UK
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.17.20133629
DO 10.1101/2020.06.17.20133629
A1 Brainard, Julii
A1 Rushton, Steven
A1 Winters, Tim
A1 Hunter, Paul R.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/18/2020.06.17.20133629.abstract
AB BACKGROUND Residential care homes for the elderly have been important settings for transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 disease. METHODS: We undertook a secondary analysis of a dataset about 248 care homes in the county of Norfolk, eastern England. The dataset recorded categories of staff (nurses, care workers and non-care workers), their status (available, absent due to leave or sickness and extra staff needed to address the coronavirus pandemic) in the period 6 April −6 May 2020. Counts of residents (if any) at each care home with COVID-19 were also available, as well as descriptions of access by the home to personal protection equipment (PPE: gloves, masks, eye protection, aprons and Sanitiser). PPE access was categorised as (most to least) green, amber or red. We undertook two stage modelling, first for any detection of COVID-19 in the homes, and a second model to relate any increases in case counts after introduction to staffing or PPE levels. RESULTS: We found that the counts of non-care workers had strongest relationships (and only link significant at p < 0.05) to any introduction of SARS-CoV-2 to the homes. After a home had at least one detected case, higher staff levels and more severe PPE shortages were most linked to higher case counts (p < 0.05) during the monitoring period. CONCLUSION: Better managing aspects of staff interaction with residents and some working practices should help reduce ingression to and spread of COVID-19 within residential homes for the elderly.What is already known on this subject?What is already known on this subject?➢ Close to 40% of all UK with COVID-19 deaths in early May of 2020 were among care home residents.➢ That this care sector was underfunded and under-equipped to prevent disease introduction and spread is recognised but the mechanisms of how disease entered or spread have not been quantified.What this study adds?What this study adds?➢ Detection of any COVID-19 cases in homes was directly linked to the counts of staff members who were not directly involved in personal care.➢ Subsequent disease spread was directly most strongly linked to lack of facemasks and eye protection, somewhat less to total counts of care workers employed.➢ The findings demonstrate an inverse strong link between available PPE and case counts in care homes after disease became present.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementProfessor Hunter and Dr. Brainard were funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) in collaboration with the University of East Anglia. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS the NIHR UEA the Department of Health or Public Health England.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data generator (North of England Commissioning Support Unit) and data provider (Norfolk County Council) approved use of the dataset for our research which was confirmed by the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Research Ethics Committee at UEA (UEA reference 2019/20-130). This follows a six-month order given on 7 April 2020 by UK government Health Secretary Matt Hancock for organisations across the NHS to share normally confidential information in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data are sensitive and we currently don't have permission from the provider to share the data widely.