PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Zhu, Tianhao AU - Xu, Kexin AU - Son, Wonchan AU - Linton-Reid, Kristofer AU - Boubnovski-Martell, Marc AU - Grech-Sollars, Matt AU - Lain, Antoine D. AU - Posma, Joram M. TI - Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation AID - 10.1101/2024.09.02.24311997 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.09.02.24311997 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/04/2024.09.02.24311997.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/04/2024.09.02.24311997.full AB - Chest X-ray (CXR) is a conventional diagnostic tool for cardiothoracic assessment, boasting a high degree of costeffectiveness and versatility. However, with an increasing number of scans to be evaluated by radiologists, they can suffer from fatigue which might impede diagnostic accuracy and slow down report generation. We describe a prototype computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) pipeline employing computer vision (CV) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) trained on the publicly available MIMICCXR dataset. We perform image quality assessment, view labelling, segmentation-based cardiomegaly severity classification, and use the output of the severity classification for large language model-based report generation. Four certified radiologists assessed the output accuracy of the CAD pipeline. Across the dataset composed of 377,100 CXR images and 227,827 free-text radiology reports, our system identified 0.18% of cases with mixedsex mentions, 0.02% of poor quality images (F1=0.81), and 0.28% of wrongly labelled views (accuracy 99.4%), furthermore it assigned views for 4.18% of images which have unlabelled views. For binary cardiomegaly classification, we achieve state-of-the-art performance of 95.2% accuracy. The inter-radiologist agreement on evaluating the report’s semantics and correctness for radiologistMIMIC is 0.62 (strict agreement) and 0.85 (relaxed agreement) similar to the radiologist-CAD agreement of 0.55 (strict) and 0.93 (relaxed). Our work found and corrected several incorrect or missing metadata annotations for the MIMIC-CXR dataset, and the performance of our CAD system suggests performance on par with human radiologists. Future improvements revolve around improved text generation and the development of CV tools for other diseases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by Health Data Research (HDR) UK and the Medical Research Council (MRC) via an UKRI Rutherford Fund Fellowship to J.M.P. (https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=MR/S004033/1). A.D.L. and J.M.P. are additionally supported by the Horizon Europe project CoDiet. The CoDiet project is funded by the European Union under Horizon Europe grant number 101084642. CoDiet research activities taking place at Imperial College London is supported by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK government's Horizon Europe funding guarantee (grant number 101084642). J.M.P. is supported by the MRC project GI-tools (https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=MR/V012452/1). The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data available at PhysioNet.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.