RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluating the Impact of NHS Strikes on Patient Flow through Emergency Departments
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.03.24312252
DO 10.1101/2024.09.03.24312252
A1 Garner, Alex
A1 Ashcroft, Quin
A1 Kirkwood, Dale
A1 Chandrabalan, Vishnu
A1 Emsley, Hedley
A1 Mason, Suzanne M
A1 Preston, Nancy
A1 Knight, Jo
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/04/2024.09.03.24312252.abstract
AB Background Since December 2022, the NHS has experienced large-scale strikes over pay by staff. Strikes heavily impact elective care delivery. The NHS cancels approximately 12 million elective care appointments each year. One million appointments have been cancelled due to strikes between 2022 and 2024. During this time emergency care is prioritised, and in a recent opinion piece, the president of the Royal College of Emergency medicine claimed the Emergency Department ran ‘better than usual’. The aim of this paper was to investigate changes in patient flow into hospitals through the ED during the strike periods.Methodology Data from two different emergency departments (EDs) in the North West of England is analysed using Cox-regression to model time between patient arrival at the ED, and subsequent admission. Various systematic and patient-level factors are controlled for. The impact of different striking groups (nurses, junior doctors etc.) on patient time to admission is analysed.Results For the Type 1 ED, hazard ratios indicate that patients are admitted through the ED more quickly on strike days where any single group of staff were striking compared to non-strike days (HRs: 1.16-1.39, all p ≤ 0.003). This increased flow was only seen for consultant strikes in the smaller ED.Interpretation These findings for all strike types indicate that improved patient flow on strike days is likely due to the increased inpatient capacity from elective care postponement. This result may indicate that there is room for change in NHS hospital systems to improve turnaround time and reduce ED crowding.What is already known on this topic Exit block is a primary issue for NHS Emergency Departments (EDs), increasing patient time spent in ED. The president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine claimed that NHS EDs run ‘better than usual’ during strikes. There is little quantitative evidence to support this claim.What this study adds This study identifies significant increases in flow of admitted patients into the hospital during the strikes, when accounting for differences in admission patterns.How this study might affect research, practice or policy The improvement in flow indicates that, although strike day service is unsustainable, elements of strike preparation can have a positive impact on the running of the emergency departments - demonstrating scope to improve patient flow through NHS EDs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAG is funded by EPSRC Doctoral Training Partnership, grant number EP/R513076/1.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The project was approved by Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine Research Ethics committee, reference FHM-2023-3868.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData supporting this study is not publicly available due to ethical considerations around accessing linked patient-level healthcare data. Please contact the main author for more information (a.garner2{at}lancaster.ac.uk).